Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30405402›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2018

Motor Learning Improvement Remains 3 Months After a Multisession Anodal tDCS Intervention in an Aging Population.

Gaëlle Dumel, Marie-Eve Bourassa, Camille Charlebois-Plante, Martine Desjardins, Julien Doyon, Dave Saint-Amour, Louis De Beaumont

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gaëlle DumelCentre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Marie-Eve BourassaCentre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Camille Charlebois-PlanteCentre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Martine DesjardinsCentre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Julien DoyonUnité de Neuroimagerie Fonctionnelle, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Dave Saint-AmourDépartement de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Louis De BeaumontCentre de Recherche de l'Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Université du Québec à Montréal · CAHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CAInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy aging is associated with decline of motor function that can generate serious consequences on the quality of life and safety. Our studies aim to explore the 3-month effects of a 5-day multisession anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) protocol applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) during motor sequence learning in elderly. The present sham-controlled aging study investigated whether tDCS-induced motor improvements previously observed 1 day after the intervention persist beyond 3 months. A total of 37 cognitively-intact aging participants performed five consecutive daily 20-min sessions of the serial-reaction time task (SRTT) concomitant with either anodal (

Indexed as

agingbrain plasticitydurabilitymotor cortexmotor learningnon-invasive brain stimulationrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID30405402
PMCPMC6207687
OpenAlexW2898120420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.