Perturbation analysis in finite LD-QBD processes and applications to epidemic models.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. On time-discretized versions of the stochastic SIS epidemic model: a comparative analysis.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021
   Article
2. A Multicompartment SIS Stochastic Model with Zonal Ventilation for the Spread of Nosocomial Infections: Detection, Outbreak Management, and Infection Control.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2019
   Article
3. Perturbation analysis in finite LD-QBD processes and applications to epidemic models.Numerical linear algebra with applications · 2018
   Article
4. Quantifying the phosphorylation timescales of receptor-ligand complexes: a Markovian matrix-analytic approach.Open biology · 2018
   Article
5. A unified stochastic modelling framework for the spread of nosocomial infections.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as