Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30405004›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes in Community Healthcare Organisations in England: A Cross-Sectional Survey to Assess Implementation of Programmes and National Toolkits.

Diane Ashiru-Oredope, Anne Doble, Mary Richard Akpan, Sejal Hansraj, Nada Atef Shebl, Raheelah Ahmad, Susan Hopkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diane Ashiru-OredopeHCAI & AMR Division, Public Health England, London NW9 5EQ, UK. diane.ashiru-oredope@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9579-2028
Anne DobleHCAI & AMR Division, Public Health England, London NW9 5EQ, UK. anne.doble@phe.gov.uk.
Mary Richard AkpanDepartment of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK. akpanmary02@gmail.com.
Sejal HansrajHCAI & AMR Division, Public Health England, London NW9 5EQ, UK. s_hansraj@hotmail.com.
Nada Atef SheblDepartment of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK. n.a.shebl@herts.ac.uk.
Raheelah AhmadNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK. raheelah.ahmad00@imperial.ac.uk.
Susan HopkinsHCAI & AMR Division, Public Health England, London NW9 5EQ, UK. susan.hopkins@phe.gov.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess antimicrobial stewardship activities in Community Healthcare Organisations (CHOs) with focus on the implementation of the two national antimicrobial stewardship toolkits, TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly, Guidance, Education, Tools) and SSTF (Start Smart, then Focus). The study utilised a web-based survey comprising 34 questions concerning antimicrobial policies and awareness and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship toolkits. This was distributed to pharmacy teams in all 26 CHOs in England. Twenty CHOs (77%) responded. An antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) committee was active in 50% of CHOs; 25% employed a substantive pharmacist post and 70% had a local antibiotic policy. Fourteen of the responding CHOs were aware of both AMS toolkits, five organisations were aware of either SSTF or TARGET, and one organisation was not aware of either toolkit. Of the organisations aware of SSTF and TARGET, eight had formally reviewed both toolkits, though three had not reviewed either. Less than half of the respondents had developed local action plans for either toolkit. National guidance in England has focused attention on initiatives to improve AMS implementation in primary and secondary care; more work is required to embed AMS activities and the implementation of national AMS toolkit recommendations within CHOs.

Indexed as

antibioticscommunity health trustscommunity hospitalsgeneral practicestart smart then focusTARGET toolkit

Identifiers

PMID30405004
PMCPMC6316239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.