Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30404614›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Overall survival and time trends in breast and cervical cancer incidence and mortality in the Regional Health District (RHD) of Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Allini Mafra da Costa, Dana Hashim, José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani, Elisabete Weiderpass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trend in cancer incidence in Mato Grosso and its health regions, Brazil, 2001-2018.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  3. Associations between dyadic communication and dyadic coping of patients with cervical cancer and their spouses: a study utilizing the actor-partner interdependence model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Contribution of alternative splicing to breast cancer metastasis.Journal of cancer metastasis and treatment · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allini Mafra da CostaHospital-Based Cancer Registry, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Vilela, 1331, Dr. Paulo Prata, Barretos, São Paulo, 14784-400, Brazil. mafra.allini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2993-7919
Dana HashimDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.
José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro FregnaniInstitute of Education and Research, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, 14784-400, Brazil.
Elisabete WeiderpassDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88881.133005/2016-01Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/03787-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast and cervical cancers represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among women. The purpose of this study was to analyse the survival and time trends in two of the most common female cancers in the Regional Health District (RHD) of Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.

methodsFrom 2000 through 2015, we calculated the breast and cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates per 100,000 women who were age-standardized to the world population. We obtained the time trends using the Joinpoint Regression software. We estimated the overall survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier methods.

resultsThe age-standardized rates (ASR) for incidence of breast cancer increased annually, with an average annual percentage change (AAPC) of 4.3 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.4 to 6.3) for invasive breast cancer and 10.2 (95% CI: 6.1 to 14.5) for in situ breast cancer. The mortality rates for invasive breast cancer decreased with an AAPC of 0.2 (95% CI: -1.9 to 2.4). The ASR incidence of invasive cervical cancer showed an AAPC of - 1.9 (95% CI: -4.7 to 0.9). For in situ cases, the ASR showed an AAPC of 9.3 (95% CI: 3.3 to 15.7). The ASR mortality for cervical cancer showed an AAPC of - 5.3 (95% CI: -9.5 to - 0.8). The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated 5-year overall survival rates of 74.3% for breast cancer and 70.7% for cervical cancer.

conclusionsThe incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer is increasing, while the mortality rates remain stable. We observed an increase in the incidence of in situ cervical cancer and a decrease in invasive incidence rates during the study period, and we noted that the cervical cancer mortality significantly declined during the study period.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrazilBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedMorbidityPopulation SurveillanceProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRisk FactorsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultBreast cancerBreast neoplasmsCervix cancerEpidemiology of chronic diseasesGynaecologic neoplasmsIncidenceMortalityTrends

Identifiers

PMID30404614
PMCPMC6223073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.