Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30404588›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2018

Research prioritisation exercises related to the care of children and young people with life-limiting conditions, their parents and all those who care for them: A systematic scoping review.

Alison Booth, Jane Maddison, Kath Wright, Lorna Fraser, Bryony Beresford

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Children's complex health: Maternal experiences of care and decision making.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024
    Article
  6. Identifying research priorities with children, youth, and families: A scoping review.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alison Booth1 Martin House Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7138-6295
Jane Maddison2 Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Kath Wright3 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Lorna Fraser1 Martin House Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Bryony Beresford2 Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/13/01/17Department of Health HS&DR/13/10/86Department of Health HTA/14/212/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn planning high-quality research in any aspect of care for children and young people with life-limiting conditions, it is important to prioritise resources in the most appropriate areas.

aimTo map research priorities identified from existing research prioritisation exercises relevant to infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions, in order to inform future research.

designWe undertook a systematic scoping review to identify existing research prioritisation exercises; the protocol is publicly available on the project website. DATA SOURCES: The bibliographic databases ASSIA, CINAHL, MEDLINE/MEDLINE In Process and Embase were searched from 2000. Relevant reference lists and websites were hand searched. Included were any consultations aimed at identifying research for the benefit of neonates, infants, children and/or young people (birth to age 25 years) with life-limiting, life-threatening or life-shortening conditions; their family, parents, carers; and/or the professional staff caring for them.

resultsA total of 24 research prioritisation exercises met the inclusion criteria, from which 279 research questions or priority areas for health research were identified. The priorities were iteratively mapped onto an evolving framework, informed by World Health Organization classifications. This resulted in identification of 16 topic areas, 55 sub-topics and 12 sub-sub-topics.

conclusionThere are numerous similar and overlapping research prioritisation exercises related to children and young people with life-limiting conditions. By mapping existing research priorities in the context in which they were set, we highlight areas to focus research efforts on. Further priority setting is not required at this time unless devoted to ascertaining families' perspectives.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesHealth Services ResearchTerminally IllAdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesChildChild Health ServicesHumansPalliative CareadolescentchildconsensusDelphi techniquehumansinfantnewbornpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID30404588
PMCPMC6238162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.