ArticlePalliative medicine2018
Research prioritisation exercises related to the care of children and young people with life-limiting conditions, their parents and all those who care for them: A systematic scoping review.
Article in Palliative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Decision-making regarding place of end-of-life care for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a systematic integrative review.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- Parents' experiences of being involved in medical decision-making for their child with a life-limiting condition: A systematic review with narrative synthesis.Palliative medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Understanding parent experiences of end-of-life care for children: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.Palliative medicine · 2023Pooled it
- A novel child-centred core palliative care outcome measure for use in clinical practice and research: findings from a multinational validation study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Children's complex health: Maternal experiences of care and decision making.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024Article
- Identifying research priorities with children, youth, and families: A scoping review.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessing the suitability of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT-Paediatric) for use with parents of children with a life-limiting condition: A qualitative secondary analysis.Palliative medicine · 2024Article
- Development of a child and family centred outcome measure for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: progress to date on the Children's Palliative Care Outcome Scale (C-POS:UK).Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
- Achieving consensus on priority items for paediatric palliative care outcome measurement: Results from a modified Delphi survey, engagement with a children's research involvement group and expert item generation.Palliative medicine · 2023Article
- Lack of systematicity in research prioritisation processes - a scoping review of evidence syntheses.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Research priorities for homecare for older people: A UK multi-stakeholder consultation.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Achieving child-centred care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions-a qualitative interview study.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].NIHR open research · 2022Article
- What do we know about evidence-informed priority setting processes to set population-level health-research agendas: an overview of reviews.Bulletin of the National Research Centre · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn planning high-quality research in any aspect of care for children and young people with life-limiting conditions, it is important to prioritise resources in the most appropriate areas.
aimTo map research priorities identified from existing research prioritisation exercises relevant to infants, children and young people with life-limiting conditions, in order to inform future research.
designWe undertook a systematic scoping review to identify existing research prioritisation exercises; the protocol is publicly available on the project website. DATA SOURCES: The bibliographic databases ASSIA, CINAHL, MEDLINE/MEDLINE In Process and Embase were searched from 2000. Relevant reference lists and websites were hand searched. Included were any consultations aimed at identifying research for the benefit of neonates, infants, children and/or young people (birth to age 25 years) with life-limiting, life-threatening or life-shortening conditions; their family, parents, carers; and/or the professional staff caring for them.
resultsA total of 24 research prioritisation exercises met the inclusion criteria, from which 279 research questions or priority areas for health research were identified. The priorities were iteratively mapped onto an evolving framework, informed by World Health Organization classifications. This resulted in identification of 16 topic areas, 55 sub-topics and 12 sub-sub-topics.
conclusionThere are numerous similar and overlapping research prioritisation exercises related to children and young people with life-limiting conditions. By mapping existing research priorities in the context in which they were set, we highlight areas to focus research efforts on. Further priority setting is not required at this time unless devoted to ascertaining families' perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.