ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018
Evanescent waves in simulated ear canals: Experimental demonstration and method for compensation.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of tympanic-membrane orientation on acoustic ear-canal quantities: A finite-element analysis.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- A comparison of ear-canal-reflectance measurement methods in an ear simulator.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- On the calculation of reflectance in non-uniform ear canals.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Article
- Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evanescent waves emerge from a small sound source that radiates into a waveguide with a larger cross-sectional area, but unlike planar waves, do not propagate far from the source. Evanescent waves thus contaminate in-ear calibration of acoustic stimuli. Measurements with an otoacoustic-emission (OAE) probe inserted at the entrance of long tubes of various diameters show a decline in the evanescent wave with distance from the source when advancing a probe tube through the OAE probe and into the long tube. The amplitude of the evanescent pressure increases with frequency and depends strongly on the diameter of the long tube. Modifying the shape of the aperture of the probe's sound source, thus effectively enlarging its diameter and redirecting acoustic flow, greatly reduced evanescent waves. The reduction in evanescent-wave pressure was observed in calibration cavities used to determine the Thévenin-equivalent source pressure and impedance of the probe. Errors in source calibrations were considerably larger in the unmodified configuration. An alternative method is proposed for calculation of acoustic source parameters that models the evanescent-wave pressure and reduces its influence on the calculation. This reduction greatly improves the quality of source calibrations, which should improve the accuracy of ear-canal impedance measurements and related quantities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.