ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018
Multidimensional stimulus encoding in the auditory nerve of the barn owl.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory perception depends on multi-dimensional information in acoustic signals that must be encoded by auditory nerve fibers (ANF). These dimensions are represented by filters with different frequency selectivities. Multiple models have been suggested; however, the identification of relevant filters and type of interactions has been elusive, limiting progress in modeling the cochlear output. Spike-triggered covariance analysis of barn owl ANF responses was used to determine the number of relevant stimulus filters and estimate the nonlinearity that produces responses from filter outputs. This confirmed that ANF responses depend on multiple filters. The first, most dominant filter was the spike-triggered average, which was excitatory for all neurons. The second and third filters could be either suppressive or excitatory with center frequencies above or below that of the first filter. The nonlinear function mapping the first two filter outputs to the spiking probability ranged from restricted to nearly circular-symmetric, reflecting different modes of interaction between stimulus dimensions across the sample. This shows that stimulus encoding in ANFs of the barn owl is multidimensional and exhibits diversity over the population, suggesting that models must allow for variable numbers of filters and types of interactions between filters to describe how sound is encoded in ANFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.