ReviewMicromachines2016
Advances in Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Devices for Food and Water Analysis.
Review in Micromachines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food Safety in the Age of Climate Change: The Rising Risk of Pesticide Residues and the Role of Sustainable Adsorbent Technologies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Ensuring food safety: Microfluidic-based approaches for the detection of food contaminants.Analytical science advances · 2024Review
- Paper-Based Aptasensors: Working Principles, Detection Modes, and Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Microfluidic paper-based device coupled with 3D printed imaging box for colorimetric detection in resource-limited settings.HardwareX · 2023Article
- Study of Mechanical Response of Paper-Based Microfluidic System as a Potential Milk Tester.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Gold Nanoparticle Paper Immunoassays for Sensing the Presence ofACS omega · 2023Article
- A device-independent method for the colorimetric quantification on microfluidic sensors using a color adaptation algorithm.Mikrochimica acta · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Rapid Detection Techniques for Pesticide Residue: A Review.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2022Review
- A New Class of Electronic Devices Based on Flexible Porous Substrates.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- In-Country Method Validation of a Paper-Based, Smartphone-Assisted Iron Sensor for Corn Flour Fortification Programs.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nitrite enhanced detection from saliva by simple geometrical modifications of paper-based micromixers.Microfluidics and nanofluidics · 2022Article
- A paper-based colorimetric molecular test for SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.Biosensors & bioelectronics: X · 2021Article
- Imbibition of Newtonian Fluids in Paper-like Materials with the Infinitesimal Control Volume Method.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Aggregation-Induced Emission in Electrochemiluminescence: Advances and Perspectives.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2021Review
- Methods of Generating Dielectrophoretic Force for Microfluidic Manipulation of Bioparticles.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Review
- A New Direction in Microfluidics: Printed Porous Materials.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Electrical Characterization of Cellulose-Based Membranes towards Pathogen Detection in Water.Biosensors · 2021Article
- An Overview of Optical and Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors for Analysis of Antioxidants in Food during the Last 5 Years.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Biosensors for Point-of-Need Diagnosis-Progress and Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Highly sensitive determination of heavy metals in water prior to and after remediation using Citrofortunella Microcarpa.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food and water contamination cause safety and health concerns to both animals and humans. Conventional methods for monitoring food and water contamination are often laborious and require highly skilled technicians to perform the measurements, making the quest for developing simpler and cost-effective techniques for rapid monitoring incessant. Since the pioneering works of Whitesides' group from 2007, interest has been strong in the development and application of microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) for food and water analysis, which allow easy, rapid and cost-effective point-of-need screening of the targets. This paper reviews recently reported μPADs that incorporate different detection methods such as colorimetric, electrochemical, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, and electrochemiluminescence techniques for food and water analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.