ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Motion Periods of Planet Gear Fault Meshing Behavior.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vibration Separation Methodology Compensated by Time-Varying Transfer Function for Fault Diagnosis of Non-Hunting Tooth Planetary Gearbox.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vibration sensors are, generally, fixed on the housing of planetary gearboxes for vibration monitoring. When a local fault occurred on the tooth of a planet gear, along with the system operating, the faulty tooth will mesh with the ring gear or sun gear at different positions referring to the fixed sensor. With consideration of the attenuation effect, the amplitudes of the fault-induced vibrations will be time-varying due to the time-varying transfer paths. These variations in signals are valuable information to identify the fault existence as well as the severity and types. However, the fault-meshing positions are time-varying and elusive due to the complicated kinematics or the compound motion behaviors of the internal rotating components. It is tough to accurately determine every fault meshing position though acquiring information from multi-sensors. However, there should exist some specific patterns of the fault meshing positions referring to the single sensor. To thoroughly investigate these motion patterns make effective fault diagnosis feasible merely by a single sensor. Unfortunately, so far few pieces of literature explicitly demonstrate these motion patterns in this regard. This article proposes a method to derive the motion periods of the fault-meshing positions with a faulty planet gear tooth, in which two conditions are considered: 1. The fault-meshing position initially occurs at the ring gear; 2. The fault-meshing position initially occurs at the sun gear. For each scenario, we derive the mathematical expression of the motion period in terms of rotational angles. These motion periods are, in essence, based on the teeth number of gears of a given planetary gearbox. Finally, the application of these motion periods for fault diagnosis is explored with experimental studies. The minimal required data length of a single sensor for effective fault diagnosis is revealed based on the motion periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.