Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30404178›Full record

ReviewGenes2018

Exploring Interactions between the Gut Microbiota and Social Behavior through Nutrition.

Cristian Pasquaretta, Tamara Gómez-Moracho, Philipp Heeb, Mathieu Lihoreau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Zebrafish (Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Zebrafish (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  12. Diet in treatment of autism spectrum disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The hygiene hypothesis, the COVID pandemic, and consequences for the human microbiome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. TheFrontiers in psychology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristian PasquarettaResearch Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI), CNRS, University Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France. cristian.pasquaretta@univ-tlse3.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8308-9968
Tamara Gómez-MorachoResearch Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI), CNRS, University Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France. tamara.gomez@univ-tlse3.fr.
Philipp HeebLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paul Sabatier, ENSFEA, 31062 Toulouse, France. philipp.heeb@univ-tlse3.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3621-9210
Mathieu LihoreauResearch Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI), CNRS, University Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France. mathieu.lihoreau@univ-tlse3.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE02-0002-01Laboratoire d'Excellence (LABEX)' TULIP ANR-10-LABX-41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes influence a wide range of host social behaviors and vice versa. So far, however, the mechanisms underpinning these complex interactions remain poorly understood. In social animals, where individuals share microbes and interact around foods, the gut microbiota may have considerable consequences on host social interactions by acting upon the nutritional behavior of individual animals. Here we illustrate how conceptual advances in nutritional ecology can help the study of these processes and allow the formulation of new empirically testable predictions. First, we review key evidence showing that gut microbes influence the nutrition of individual animals, through modifications of their nutritional state and feeding decisions. Next, we describe how these microbial influences and their social consequences can be studied by modelling populations of hosts and their gut microbiota into a single conceptual framework derived from nutritional geometry. Our approach raises new perspectives for the study of holobiont nutrition and will facilitate theoretical and experimental research on the role of the gut microbiota in the mechanisms and evolution of social behavior.

Indexed as

gut microbiotanutritionnutritional geometrysocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID30404178
PMCPMC6266758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.