Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30404163›Full record

ArticleProteomes2018

A Comparative Quantitative LC-MS/MS Profiling Analysis of Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Adjacent-Normal Tissue, and Patient-Derived Tumour Xenografts.

Orla Coleman, Michael Henry, Fiona O'Neill, Sandra Roche, Niall Swan, Lorraine Boyle, Jean Murphy, Justine Meiller, Neil T Conlon, Justin Geoghegan and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Orla ColemanNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. orla.coleman2@mail.dcu.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-4579-7522
Michael HenryNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. michael.henry@dcu.ie.
Fiona O'NeillNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. fiona.oneill@dcu.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-6935-5171
Sandra RocheNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. sandra.roche@dcu.ie.
Niall SwanSt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland. nswan@svhg.ie.
Lorraine BoyleSt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland. L.Boyle@st-vincents.ie.
Jean MurphySt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland. J.Murphy@st-vincents.ie.
Justine MeillerNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. justine.meiller@dcu.ie.
Neil T ConlonNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. neil.conlon4@mail.dcu.ie.
Justin GeogheganSt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland. geoghegj@indigo.ie.
Kevin C ConlonSt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland. conlonk@tcd.ie.
Vincent LynchNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. glynch96@gmail.com.
Ninfa L StraubingerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Nls2@buffalo.edu.
Robert M StraubingerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Rms@buffalo.edu.
Gerard McVeySt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland. gerard.mcvey@slh.ie.
Michael MoriartyNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. michaelmoriartyirl@gmail.com.
Paula MeleadyNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. paula.meleady@dcu.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-4579-7522
Martin ClynesNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland. martin.clynes@dcu.ie.
Dublin City University · IESt. Vincent's University Hospital · IESt. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland SFI/14/US/B2997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide; it develops in a relatively symptom-free manner, leading to rapid disease progression and metastasis, leading to a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. A lack of dependable diagnostic markers and rapid development of resistance to conventional therapies are among the problems associated with management of the disease. A better understanding of pancreatic tumour biology and discovery of new potential therapeutic targets are important goals in pancreatic cancer research. This study describes the comparative quantitative LC-MS/MS proteomic analysis of the membrane-enriched proteome of 10 human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, 9 matched adjacent-normal pancreas and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) in mice (10 at F1 generation and 10 F2). Quantitative label-free LC-MS/MS data analysis identified 129 proteins upregulated, and 109 downregulated, in PDAC, compared to adjacent-normal tissue. In this study, analysing peptide MS/MS data from the xenografts, great care was taken to distinguish species-specific peptides definitively derived from human sequences, or from mice, which could not be distinguished. The human-only peptides from the PDXs are of particular value, since only human tumour cells survive, and stromal cells are replaced during engraftment in the mouse; this list is, therefore, enriched in tumour-associated proteins, some of which might be potential therapeutic or diagnostic targets. Using human-specific sequences, 32 proteins were found to be upregulated, and 113 downregulated in PDX F1 tumours, compared to primary PDAC. Differential expression of CD55 between PDAC and normal pancreas, and expression across PDX generations, was confirmed by Western blotting. These data indicate the value of using PDX models in PDAC research. This study is the first comparative proteomic analysis of PDAC which employs PDX models to identify patient tumour cell-associated proteins, in an effort to find robust targets for therapeutic treatment of PDAC.

Indexed as

ADC therapymembrane-enrichedpancreatic cancerPDXproteomics

Identifiers

PMID30404163
PMCPMC6313850
OpenAlexW2899933734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.