Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30404148›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Anthracyclines as Topoisomerase II Poisons: From Early Studies to New Perspectives.

Jessica Marinello, Maria Delcuratolo, Giovanni Capranico

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Roles of Topoisomerases in Transcriptional Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Diabetes and cancer: therapeutic implications.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  15. Caught in the crossfire: cardiac complications of cancer therapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  16. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica MarinelloDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy. jessica.marinello@unibo.it.
Maria DelcuratoloDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy. mdelcuratolo@gmail.com.
Giovanni CapranicoDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy. giovanni.capranico@unibo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-6454
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian DNA topoisomerases II are targets of anticancer anthracyclines that act by stabilizing enzyme-DNA complexes wherein DNA strands are cut and covalently linked to the protein. This molecular mechanism is the molecular basis of anthracycline anticancer activity as well as the toxic effects such as cardiomyopathy and induction of secondary cancers. Even though anthracyclines have been used in the clinic for more than 50 years for solid and blood cancers, the search of breakthrough analogs has substantially failed. The recent developments of personalized medicine, availability of individual genomic information, and immune therapy are expected to change significantly human cancer therapy. Here, we discuss the knowledge of anthracyclines as Topoisomerase II poisons, their molecular and cellular effects and toxicity along with current efforts to improve the therapeutic index. Then, we discuss the contribution of the immune system in the anticancer activity of anthracyclines, and the need to increase our knowledge of molecular mechanisms connecting the drug targets to the immune stimulatory pathways in cancer cells. We propose that the complete definition of the molecular interaction of anthracyclines with the immune system may open up more effective and safer ways to treat patients with these drugs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic AgentsCardiotoxicityCell DeathDNA DamageDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIEnzyme ActivationHumansImmune SystemMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryTopoisomerase II InhibitorsAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic AgentsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IITopoisomerase II InhibitorsanthracyclinesDNA damageimmunogenic cell deathtopoisomerase IItoxic effects

Identifiers

PMID30404148
PMCPMC6275052
OpenAlexW2899552791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.