Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30403742›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

An ELISA-based method for detection of rabies virus nucleoprotein-specific antibodies in human antemortem samples.

Susan Realegeno, Michael Niezgoda, Pamela A Yager, Amrita Kumar, Laboni Hoque, Lillian Orciari, Suryaprakash Sambhara, Victoria A Olson, Panayampalli Subbian Satheshkumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Recent updates on laboratory diagnosis of rabies.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection and Prevention of Virus Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan RealegenoPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Michael NiezgodaPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Pamela A YagerPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Amrita KumarImmunology and Pathogenesis Branch, Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Laboni HoquePoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Lillian OrciariPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Suryaprakash SambharaImmunology and Pathogenesis Branch, Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Victoria A OlsonPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Panayampalli Subbian SatheshkumarPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies is a fatal encephalitic disease in humans and animals caused by lyssaviruses, most commonly rabies virus (RABV). Human antemortem diagnosis of rabies is a complex process involving multiple sample types and tests for the detection of antibodies, antigen (protein), and nucleic acids (genomic RNA). Serological diagnosis of human rabies includes the detection of either neutralizing or binding antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serum samples from unimmunized individuals without prior rabies vaccination or passive immunization with purified immunoglobulins. While neutralizing antibodies are targeted against the surface-expressed glycoprotein (G protein), binding antibodies to viral antigens are predominantly against the nucleoprotein (N protein), although there can be antibodies against all RABV-expressed proteins. To determine N protein-specific antibody responses in the CSF and serum during RABV infection, we developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with purified recombinant N protein expressed in E. coli. N protein-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) subtypes IgG and IgM were detected in the CSF or serum of previously diagnosed human rabies cases. In addition, anti-N protein seroconversion was demonstrated over the course of illness in individual rabies cases. We compared the N protein ELISA results to those of an indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test, the current binding antibody assay used in diagnosis, and show that our ELISA is consistent with the IFA test. Sensitivity and specificity of the N protein ELISA ranged from 78.38-100% and 75.76-96.77% with respect to the IFA results. Our data provide evidence for the use of an N protein ELISA as an additional option for the detection of RABV-specific IgG or IgM antibodies in human CSF or serum specimens.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MNucleoproteinsRabiesRabies virusSensitivity and SpecificityViral ProteinsAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MNucleoproteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30403742
PMCPMC6221316
OpenAlexW2899699453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.