ArticlePloS one2018
Time wears on: Assessing how bone wears using 3D surface texture analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- From engineered standards to natural bone: re-constraining topographical scanning for heritage samples.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental and archaeological assessment of use-wear persistence on burnt flint from Tinshemet Cave.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A bone tool used by neanderthal for flaying carcasses at the Abri du Maras (France).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Open Aurignacian Project: 3D scanning and the digital preservation of the Italian Paleolithic record.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Ethnographic toolstone heat treatment reveals distinctive motives and patterns of material transformation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characteristics of lithic artifact weathering at the Semizbugu surface site complex in semi-arid Central Kazakhstan.Archaeological and anthropological sciences · 2025Article
- An experimental approach on dynamic occlusal fingerprint analysis to simulate use-wear localisation and development on stone tools.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- First identification of a Neanderthal bone spear point through an interdisciplinary analysis at Abric Romaní (NE Iberian Peninsula).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Laccase-Treated Polystyrene Surfaces with Caffeic Acid, Dopamine, and L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine Substrates Facilitate the Proliferation of Melanocytes and Embryonal Carcinoma Cells NTERA-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A 36,200-year-old carving from Grotte des Gorges, Amange, Jura, France.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Multiproxy analysis of Upper Palaeolithic lustrous gravels supports their anthropogenic use.PloS one · 2023Article
- Technological and functional analysis of 80-60 ka bone wedges from Sibudu (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The effect of worked material hardness on stone tool wear.PloS one · 2022Article
- The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Dental wear proxy correlation in a long-term feeding experiment on sheep (Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Polish is quantitatively different on quartzite flakes used on different worked materials.PloS one · 2020Article
- The effect of numerical aperture on quantitative use-wear studies and its implication on reproducibility.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Use-wear analysis provides a means of studying traces produced on animal bone during manufacture and use in an effort to reconstruct these processes. Often, these analyses are qualitative and based on experience and expertise. Previous studies have focused on interpreting final traces, but little is known about how these traces develop and change over time. We propose the use of an innovative quantitative method for studying bone surface traces that aims to reduce any unreliable or non-replicable results that can confound more traditional qualitative analyses. We seek to understand the basics of use-wear formation over Time by taking incremental molds of bone specimens subjected to a controlled, mechanical experiment. This study assesses how bone wears during extended use on three Material types (fresh skin, processed leather, or dry bark), from three initial Manufacturing states (unworked, ground with sandstone, or scraped with flint). With data obtained from a confocal disc-scanning microscope, we then apply 3D surface texture analysis using ISO 25178 parameters: surface roughness [Sa], autocorrelation length [Sal], peak curvature [Spc], and upper material ratio [Smr1]. We employ a multilevel multivariate Bayesian model to explain parameter variation under experimental conditions. Our findings show how duration of use strongly affects the transformation of the bone's surface. Unworked bone is completely distinguishable from bone used for long time intervals and those modified by scraping. Interestingly, material wear does not often produce type-specific traces, but does affect the rate of bone alteration and how it is transformed. Specifically, fresh skin transforms bone at a faster rate than other materials. This novel quantitative and experimental approach enhances our understanding of the use of bone as a raw material for making and using tools and provides a foundation for future exploration of archaeological materials and questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.