ArticlePloS one2018
Nutritional resilience in Nepal following the earthquake of 2015.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoupling food insecurity from shocks: A global analysis of food system resilience.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Field study on the health status of children aged 0-18 in container cities after the 2023 Türkiye earthquake - Hatay example.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Resilience in maternal, newborn, and child health in low- and middle-income countries: findings from a scoping review.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Food insecurity in Piura, Peru, in the context of post-earthquake and the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Vulnerability in maternal, new-born, and child health in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from a scoping review.PloS one · 2022Article
- Associations between hurricane exposure, food insecurity, and microfinance; a cross-sectional study in Haiti.World development · 2021Article
- Food insecurity and compound environmental shocks in Nepal: Implications for a changing climate.World development · 2021Article
- The Risk Factors for Child Anemia Are Consistent across 3 National Surveys in Nepal.Current developments in nutrition · 2021Article
- Small-Scale Livestock Production in Nepal Is Directly Associated with Children's Increased Intakes of Eggs and Dairy, But Not Meat.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Changes in nutritional status of children who lived in temporary shelters in Bhaktapur municipality after the 2015 Nepal earthquake.Tropical medicine and health · 2020Article
- Prevalence of damaged and missing teeth among women in the southern plains of Nepal: Findings of a simplified assessment tool.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2015 earthquake in Nepal caused massive damages and triggered relief activities to minimize human suffering. The post-earthquake nutrition and food security situation in the hardest hit areas remains uncertain.
methodsTwo national cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 2014 and 2016 among households (HH) with pre-school aged children or newly married women. Of the 21 village development committees (VDCs) included in this sample, 7 fell within "earthquake-affected" areas. This paper presents data from 982 HH, 1015 women, and 883 children from 2014 and 1056 HH, 1083 women, and 998 children from 2016 living in these areas, with longitudinal overlap of about 55%. Prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and logistic regression was used to calculate p-values, both using robust estimates of standard errors to account for clustering.
resultsFrom 2014 to 2016, child wasting (weight-for-height z score <-2) fell from 4.5% (95% CI 3.3%- 6.1%) to 2.1% (1.4%- 3.1%) and food insecurity (assessed using the household food insecurity access scale) dropped from 17.6% (11.7%- 25.6%) to 12.4% (6.9%- 21.2%). Child stunting prevalence remained similar at both time-points. Improvements were also evident in dietary diversity and breastfeeding indicators.
conclusionsNutrition and food security conditions remained comparable or improved one year after the earthquake despite evidence of structural and other damage. Livelihood resilience to shocks and/or effective nutrition, food or health interventions may have helped buffer the impact on nutrition, although this hypothesis requires further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.