Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30403559›Full record

ArticleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics2019

An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.

Yu Du, Jun Yin, Daniel J Sargent, Sumithra J Mandrekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Road Map for Designing Phase I Clinical Trials of Radiotherapy-Novel Agent Combinations.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu Dua Department of Biostatistics , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , MD , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0255-6283
Jun Yinb Cancer Center Statistics , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA.
Daniel J Sargentb Cancer Center Statistics , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA.
Sumithra J Mandrekarb Cancer Center Statistics , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA.

Funding

Methodology for development, validation, and use of novel endpoints in oncologyR01CA174779 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MANDREKAR, SUMITHRA JAY · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase I designs traditionally use the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), a binary endpoint from the first treatment cycle, to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) assuming a monotonically increasing relationship between dose and efficacy. In this article, we establish a general framework for a multi-stage adaptive design where we jointly model a continuous efficacy outcome and continuous/quasi-continuous toxicity endpoints from multiple treatment cycles. The normalized Total Toxicity Profile (nTTP) is used as an illustration for quasi-continuous toxicity endpoints, and we replace DLT with nTTP to take into account multiple grades and types of toxicities. In addition, the proposed design accommodates non-monotone dose-efficacy relationships, and longitudinal toxicity data in effort to capture the adverse events from multiple cycles. Stage 1 of our design uses toxicity data to perform dose-escalation and identify a set of initially allowable (safe) doses; stage 2 of our design incorporates an efficacy outcome to update the set of allowable doses for each new cohort and randomizes the new cohort of patients to the allowable doses with emphasis towards those with higher predicted efficacy. Stage 3 uses all data from all treated patients at the end of the trial to make final recommendations. Simulations showed that the design had a high probability of making the correct dose selection and good overdose control across various dose-efficacy and dose-toxicity scenarios. In addition, the proposed design allows for early termination when all doses are too toxic. To our best knowledge, the proposed dual-endpoint dose-finding design is the first such study to incorporate multiple cycles of toxicities and a continuous efficacy outcome.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsModels, StatisticalTreatment OutcomeAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsBayes TheoremClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaximum Tolerated DoseResearch DesignAntineoplastic AgentsAdaptive designbayesian methoddose-findingjoint modelingphase I clinical trialtoxicity-efficacy dual endpoint

Identifiers

PMID30403559
PMCPMC6379115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.