ArticleAJR. American journal of roentgenology2019
Impact of a Health Information Technology-Enabled Appropriate Use Criterion on Utilization of Emergency Department CT for Renal Colic.
Article in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of information systems in emergency department decision-making-a literature review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Pooled it
- Advocating for Change: Unveiling the Challenges of an Ultrasound-First Approach in Uncomplicated Renal Colic.Cureus · 2025Article
- Enhancing analgesia in acute renal colic pain: a randomized controlled trial of gabapentin adjunct to ketorolac-based regimen.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Applying Natural Language Processing to Textual Data From Clinical Data Warehouses: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Review
- Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for assessment and management of renal colic in the emergency department.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023Article
- Combining text mining with clinical decision support in clinical practice: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Radiation concerns in frequent flyer patients: should imaging history influence decisions about recurrent imaging?The British journal of radiology · 2021Review
- Lessons From the Free-Text Epidemic: Opportunities to Optimize Deployment of Imaging Clinical Decision Support.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2021Article
- Patients undergoing recurrent CT exams: assessment of patients with non-malignant diseases, reasons for imaging and imaging appropriateness.European radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an appropriate use criterion (AUC) for renal colic based on local best practice, implemented as electronic clinical decision support (CDS), on the emergency department (ED) use of CT for patients with suspected nephrolithiasis. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective cohort study was performed in the EDs of a level I trauma center (study site) and local comparable hospital (control site). An AUC for patients younger than 50 years with a history of uncomplicated nephrolithiasis presenting with renal colic was developed by an interdisciplinary emergency medicine, emergency radiology, and urology team and embedded as CDS. AUC-consistent CT of ureter requests received no CDS alert. Otherwise, the orderer was alerted to consider a trial of symptomatic control or discharge without CT. A natural language processing tool mined ED notes for visits in September 2010-February 2012 (before AUC implementation) and April 2013-September 2014 (1 year after implementation) for concept unique identifiers of flank tenderness or renal or ureteral pain. Manual review excluded noneligible cases; the others were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. Chi-square tests were used to assess for CT rate differences, the primary outcome.
resultsThe final sample included 467 patients (194 study site) before and 306 (88 study site) after AUC implementation. The study site's CT of ureter rate decreased from 23.7% (46/194) to 14.8% (13/88) (p = 0.03) after implementation of the AUC. The rate at the control site remained unchanged, 49.8% (136/273) versus 48.2% (105/218) (p = 0.3).
conclusionImplementing an AUC based on local best practice as CDS may effectively curb potential imaging overuse in a subset of ED patients with renal colic unlikely to have a complicated course or alternative dangerous diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.