Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30403304›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Paediatric extrapolation: A necessary paradigm shift.

Cécile Ollivier, Yeruk Lily Mulugeta, Lucia Ruggieri, Agnes Saint-Raymond, Lynne Yao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Pediatric Market Access: A Qualitative Study.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Extrapolation as a Default Strategy in Pediatric Drug Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Paediatric extrapolation: the panacea for paediatric drug development?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  16. Paediatric extrapolation: A necessary paradigm shift.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cécile OllivierEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7315-1104
Yeruk Lily MulugetaFood and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Lucia RuggieriEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Agnes Saint-RaymondEuropean Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Lynne YaoFood and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Legislative initiatives have been successful in increasing the availability of approved therapies for paediatric patients. However, additional measures to ensure the timely completion of paediatric studies are necessary to further increase the number of medicines available to children. Over the last 3 years, international experts convened to revise the ICH E11 guideline on clinical investigations of medicinal products in paediatric populations to harmonize approaches to paediatric extrapolation, striving to reduce substantial differences between regions in the acceptance of data for global paediatric medicine development programmes. Several areas of therapeutics development in children, such as human immunodeficiency virus and partial-onset seizures, have been streamlined and require fewer children enrolled in clinical trials because of the appropriate application of paediatric extrapolation. Based on this experience, it is clear that for paediatric extrapolation strategies to reach their full potential there is the need to understand the quality and quantity of data, often collected in adult patients, that will inform the appropriateness of the use of paediatric extrapolation, as well as to identify gaps in knowledge with respect to disease pathophysiology, organ maturation or drug target ontogeny. The generation of information that enhances our current understanding of these gaps in knowledge can further decrease the need for larger, paediatric clinical trials and can increase the efficiency of paediatric therapeutics development as well as protect children from participation in unnecessary studies. We hope that this publication will increase awareness, input and support from all the stakeholders involved in paediatric therapeutics development.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalGuidelines as TopicAge FactorsChildClinical Trials as TopicEuropean UnionHumansResearch Designclinical pharmacologydrug regulationevidence-based medicineoptimal design pharmacodynamicspaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID30403304
PMCPMC6422664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.