Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30403012›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

National Cancer Database report of nonmetastatic esophageal small cell carcinoma.

Vivek Verma, Richard L Sleightholm, Penny Fang, Jeffrey M Ryckman, Chi Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vivek VermaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-6023
Richard L SleightholmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Penny FangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jeffrey M RyckmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Chi LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.ORCID 0000-0002-7279-0473
Nebraska Medical Center · USAllegheny General Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal small cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a rare malignancy for which there is no consensus management approach. This is the largest known analysis of nonmetastatic ESCC patients to date, evaluating national practice patterns and outcomes of surgical-based therapy vs chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs chemotherapy alone.

methodsThe National Cancer Data Base was queried for esophageal cancer patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic ESCC. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with receipt of surgical-based management. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) and the log-rank test is used to compare OS between groups; Cox univariate and multivariate analyses determined variables associated with OS.

resultsAltogether, 323 patients were analyzed; 64 (20%) patients underwent surgical-based therapy, 211 (65%) CRT, and 48 (15%) chemotherapy alone. On multivariable analysis, no single factor significantly predicted for administration of surgery. Despite no OS differences between the surgery-based (median OS 21 months) and CRT arms (18 months), both were superior to CT alone (10 months) (P < 0.001). Among other factors, receiving any local therapy independently predicted for higher OS over chemotherapy alone on Cox multivariate analysis (P < 0.001).

conclusionsThis study of a large, contemporary national database demonstrates that most ESCC is treated with CRT in the United States; adding local therapy to systemic therapy may be beneficial to these patients, although individualized multidisciplinary management is still recommended.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Small CellChemoradiotherapyDatabases, FactualEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Proportional Hazards ModelsUnited Stateschemotherapyesophageal cancerradiation therapysmall cell carcinomasurgery

Identifiers

PMID30403012
PMCPMC6308049
OpenAlexW2899719917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.