Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402983›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2019

Assessment of beam-matched linacs quality/accuracy for interchanging SBRT or SRT patient using VMAT without replanning.

Zhengzheng Xu, Gregory Warrell, Soyoung Lee, Valdir Colussi, Yiran Zheng, Rodney Ellis, Mitchell Machtay, Tarun Podder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Determination of small-field output factors for beam-matched linear accelerators using various detectors and comparison of detector-specific output correction factors using IAEA Technical Report Series 483 protocol.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Survey of patient-specific quality assurance practice for IMRT and VMAT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhengzheng XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Gregory WarrellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Soyoung LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Valdir ColussiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Yiran ZhengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Rodney EllisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mitchell MachtayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Tarun PodderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDosimetric accuracy is critical when switching a patient treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SRT) among beam-matched linacs. In this study, the dose delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for SBRT/SRT patients were evaluated on three beam-matched linacs.

methodBeam data measurements such as percentage depth dose (PDD

resultsDifference in beam outputs, beam profiles, and MLC leaf transmission factors of beam-matched linacs were all within ±1%, except the difference in output factor for 1 × 1 cm

conclusionMinimal differences in beam parameters, point doses, and passing rates among three linacs proved the viability of swapping SBRT/SRT using VMAT among beam-matched linacs. The effect of plan complexity on passing rate difference among beam-matched linacs is not statistically significant.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingBrain NeoplasmsHumansLung NeoplasmsOrgans at RiskParticle AcceleratorsRadiometryRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedbeam-matchingSBRTsmall field dosimetry

Identifiers

PMID30402983
PMCPMC6333115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.