Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402927›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2019

Value-based assessment of hysterectomy approaches.

Natalya Danilyants, Paul MacKoul, Rupen Baxi, Louise Q van der Does, Leah R Haworth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Laparoscopic-assisted myomectomy: Surgery center versus outpatient hospital.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalya DanilyantsThe Center for Innovative GYN Care, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Paul MacKoulThe Center for Innovative GYN Care, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Rupen BaxiThe Center for Innovative GYN Care, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Louise Q van der DoesThe Center for Innovative GYN Care, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8487-8870
Leah R HaworthThe Center for Innovative GYN Care, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Innovative Clinical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimBy evaluating operative outcomes relative to cost, we compared the value of minimally invasive hysterectomy approaches, including a technique discussed less often in the literature, laparoscopic retroperitoneal hysterectomy (LRH), which incorporates retroperitoneal dissection and ligation of the uterine arteries at their vascular origin.

methodsRetrospective chart review of all women (N = 2689) aged greater than or equal to 18 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions from 2011 to 2013 at a high-volume hospital in Maryland, USA. Procedures included: laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH), total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), and LRH.

resultsTotal vaginal hysterectomy had the highest intraoperative complication rate (9.6%; P < 0.0001) but the lowest postoperative complication rate (1.8%; P < 0.0001). Robotics had the highest postoperative complication rate (11.4%; P < 0.0001). LRH had the shortest operative time (71.2 min; P < 0.0001) and the lowest intraoperative complication rates (2.1%; P < 0.0001). LRH and TVH were the least costly (averaging $4061 and $6416, respectively), while RALH was the most costly ($9354). Taking both operative outcomes and cost into account, LRH, TVH and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy yielded the highest value scores; total laparoscopic hysterectomy, RALH, and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy yielded the lowest.

conclusionUnderstanding the value of surgical interventions requires an evaluation of both operative outcomes and direct hospital costs. Using a quality-cost framework, the LRH approach as performed by high-volume laparoscopic specialists emerged as having the highest calculated value.

Indexed as

HysterectomyIntraoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansHysterectomy, VaginalMiddle AgedRetroperitoneal SpaceRetrospective Studiescosthysterectomylaparoscopicretroperitonealvalue

Identifiers

PMID30402927
PMCPMC6587959
OpenAlexW2899868826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.