Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402909›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2019

How chromosomal rearrangements shape adaptation and speciation: Case studies in Drosophila pseudoobscura and its sibling species Drosophila persimilis.

Zachary L Fuller, Spencer A Koury, Nitin Phadnis, Stephen W Schaeffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The entireAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Population genomics ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zachary L FullerDepartment of Biology, 208 Erwin W. Mueller Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-4765-9227
Spencer A KouryDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0002-9782-8343
Nitin PhadnisDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0001-8083-0917
Stephen W SchaefferDepartment of Biology, 208 Erwin W. Mueller Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-2070-5342

Funding

Computation, Bioinformatics, and Statistics (CBIOS) Training ProgramT32GM102057 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI CHIAROMONTE, FRANCESCA, GIRIRAJAN, SANTHOSH · 2013 to 2022
$2.7M
The molecular basis of speciation in DrosophilaR01GM115914 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PHADNIS, NITIN · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
The mechanisms of segregation distortion in DrosophilaR01GM141422 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PHADNIS, NITIN · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
Genomic Mechanisms of Chromosomal Rearrangements in Drosophila PseudoobscuraR01GM098478 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI SCHAEFFER, STEPHEN W · 2011 to 2014
$763k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098478NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115914NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141422NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM102057NIH HHS R01 GM098478NIH HHS R01 GM115914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gene arrangements of Drosophila have played a prominent role in the history of evolutionary biology from the original quantification of genetic diversity to current studies of the mechanisms for the origin and establishment of new inversion mutations within populations and their subsequent fixation between species supporting reproductive barriers. This review examines the genetic causes and consequences of inversions as recombination suppressors and the role that recombination suppression plays in establishing inversions in populations as they are involved in adaptation within heterogeneous environments. This often results in the formation of clines of gene arrangement frequencies among populations. Recombination suppression leads to the differentiation of the gene arrangements which may accelerate the accumulation of fixed genetic differences among populations. If these fixed mutations cause incompatibilities, then inversions pose important reproductive barriers between species. This review uses the evolution of inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis as a case study for how inversions originate, establish and contribute to the evolution of reproductive isolation.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationAcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsChromosome InversionDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularGene OrderGenome, InsectReproductive Isolationchromosomal inversionsDrosophilalinkage disequilibriumpopulation genomicsrecombinationreproductive isolationspeciation

Identifiers

PMID30402909
PMCPMC6475473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.