Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402904›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2020

Circadian disruption: What do we actually mean?

Céline Vetter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Circadian clock regulation of hemostasis: a systematic review of molecular pathways.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Céline VetterDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0002-3752-1067

Funding

Impact of Malatonin, Food Timing and Receptor Variant on Type 2 Diabetes RiskR01DK105072 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SAXENA, RICHA, SCHEER, FRANK A · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
Novel Circadian Exposure Metrics for Shift WorkersR21OH011052 · OH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCHERNHAMMER, EVA S · 2016 to 2017
$457k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105072NIOSH CDC HHS R21 OH011052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian system regulates physiology and behavior. Acute challenges to the system, such as those experienced when traveling across time zones, will eventually result in re-synchronization to local environmental time cues, but this re-synchronization is oftentimes accompanied by adverse short-term consequences. When such challenges are experienced chronically, adaptation may not be achieved, as for example in the case of rotating night shift workers. The transient and chronic disturbance of the circadian system is most frequently referred to as "circadian disruption", but many other terms have been proposed and used to refer to similar situations. It is now beyond doubt that the circadian system contributes to health and disease, emphasizing the need for clear terminology when describing challenges to the circadian system and their consequences. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the terms used to describe disruption of the circadian system, discuss proposed quantifications of disruption in experimental and observational settings with a focus on human research, and highlight limitations and challenges of currently available tools. For circadian research to advance as a translational science, clear, operationalizable, and scalable quantifications of circadian disruption are key, as they will enable improved assessment and reproducibility of results, ideally ranging from mechanistic settings, including animal research, to large-scale randomized clinical trials.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmAnimalsHumansReproducibility of Resultschronic diseasechronotypecircadian desynchronizationcircadian desynchronycircadian misalignmentsocial jetlag

Identifiers

PMID30402904
PMCPMC6504624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.