ArticleHNO2019
[Sonographic analysis of swallowing in the cervical section of the esophagus].
Article in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysphagia is a common symptom reported by patients in various medical fields, raising the question of diagnosis. In addition to otorhinolaryngologic examination with a mirror, the current gold standards videofluoroscopy and fiber optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) are available. Ultrasound is frequently used in everyday clinical practice, although its application for swallowing diagnostics needs addressing. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween April 2012 and February 2014, 81 subjects (age 19-66 years) with no indication of a swallowing disorder were sonographically examined. The anatomic representation of swallowing structures was evaluated and videos of the cervical part of the esophagus during swallowing of different consistencies (saliva, water, jelly) were recorded and analyzed. In a pilot study, the examination was tested on 3 dysphagia patients.
resultsThe base of the tongue, the intralaryngeal structures, the cervical spine, and the thyroid glands were well visualized. Sonographic representation of the cervical esophagus section was particularly successful. Its length could be detected at 5.78 ± 1.66 cm, the diameter measured at 0.88 ± 0.10 cm. Sonographic inspection of the sinus piriformis was most difficult; it could not be seen in 39.5% of cases. Visualization of the sinus piriformis was better in cases of normal weight and age <25 years (odds ratios 5.6 and 11.3, respectively). In the examination of patients with a swallowing disorder, three different pathologies (Forestier's disease, esophageal stenosis, and motor neuron disease) were identified as the cause of complaints.
conclusionSonography enables very good visualization of swallowing and evaluation of the cervical esophagus. Where available, the otorhinolaryngologist should consider ultrasound as a diagnostic option, as it enables repeated evaluation of swallowing and can complement previously available diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.