Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402801›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2018

An Automatic Channel Selection Approach for ICA-Based Motor Imagery Brain Computer Interface.

Jing Ruan, Xiaopei Wu, Bangyan Zhou, Xiaojing Guo, Zhao Lv

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing RuanThe Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing, Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Xiaopei WuThe Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing, Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei, China. wxp2001@ahu.edu.cn.
Bangyan ZhouThe Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing, Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Xiaojing GuoThe Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing, Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Zhao LvThe Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing, Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei, China.

Funding

Anhui University Center of Information Support & Assurance Technology Open Foundation ADXXBZ201505National Natural Science Foundation of China 61271352University Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province KJ2016A043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) is a potential spatial filtering method for the implementation of motor imagery brain-computer interface (MIBCI). However, ICA-based MIBCI (ICA-MIBCI) is sensitive to electroencephalogram (EEG) channels and the quality of the training data, which are two crucial factors affecting the stability and classification performance of ICA-MIBCI. To address these problems, this paper is mainly focused on the investigation of EEG channel optimization. As a reference, we constructed a single-trial-based ICA-MIBCI system with commonly used channels and common spatial pattern-based MIBCI (CSP-MIBCI). To minimize the impact of artifacts on EEG channel optimization, a data-quality evaluation method, named "self-testing" in this paper, was used in a single-trial-based ICA-MIBCI system to evaluate the quality of single trials in each dataset; the resulting self-testing accuracies were used for the selection of high-quality trials. Given several candidate channel configurations, ICA filters were calculated using selected high-quality trials and applied to the corresponding ICA-MIBCI implementation. Optimal channels for each dataset were assessed and selected according to the self-testing results related to various candidate configurations. Forty-eight MI datasets of six subjects were employed in this study to validate the proposed methods. Experimental results revealed that the average classification accuracy of the optimal channels yielded a relative increment of 2.8% and 8.5% during self-testing, 14.4% and 9.5% during session-to-session transfer, and 36.2% and 26.7% during subject-to-subject transfer compared to CSP-MIBCI and ICA-MIBCI with fixed the channel configuration. This work indicates that the proposed methods can efficiently improve the practical feasibility of ICA-MIBCI.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain-Computer InterfacesSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedElectroencephalographyHumansBrain computer interfaceChannel selectionIndependent component analysisMotor imagery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.