Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402798›Full record

ReviewLasers in medical science2019

Is there a measure for low power laser dose?

Adenilson de Souza da Fonseca

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lasers in medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adenilson de Souza da FonsecaDepartamento de Biofísica e Biometria, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Boulevard Vinte e Oito de Setembro, Avenida 28 de Setembro, 87, fundos, Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, 20551030, Brazil. adnfonseca@yahoo.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low power lasers have been used successfully for treatment of many diseases in soft and bone tissues. Basic and clinical researches have developed quickly being the scientific basis to therapeutic protocols based on these lasers. However, there are difficulties to compare experimental and clinical results obtained from different researchers because a complicated and intricate list of physical and biological parameters should be checked before the irradiation procedures as well as part of these parameters are omitted or inaccurately reported. This review focuses on the physical and biological parameters proposed to make experimental and clinical protocols accurate and reproducible as well as suggests dose parameters based on biological effects induced by low power lasers. A variety of parameters are reported by different authors and the number of parameter suggested could overcome three dozens. Thus, laser dose and laser dose equivalent are defined based on laser-induced biological effects and suggested as simplified dose parameters for low power lasers. These parameters could simplify and be useful to researchers and clinicians, permitting comparisons and decreasing mistakes and inaccuracies when laser-induced effects are evaluated and compared with those obtained in previous studies. The laser dose and laser dose equivalent could contribute significantly to improve accuracy, effectiveness, and safety of clinical protocols based on low power lasers.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansOrgan SpecificityDoseEnergyFluenceLaserPower densitySpot size

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.