Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402739›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2019

[Nurses' perspectives on outpatient palliative care in Vorarlberg, Austria].

K Rizza, G Mathis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K RizzaBildungshaus Batschuns, Kapf 1, 6835, Zwischenwasser, Österreich. katharina.rizza@bhba.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8937-484X
G MathisBildungshaus Batschuns, Kapf 1, 6835, Zwischenwasser, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the demographic development the need for palliative care in the outpatient setting will increase and challenge general practitioners and community nurses.

aimThis study investigated the state of outpatient palliative care in Vorarlberg, Austria from the perspective of outpatient community nurses. The key points of the survey covered the burden of symptoms suffered by palliative patients. Another key focus was the cooperation and communication between community nurses and general practitioners.

methodsBetween 8 February and 7 March 2016 all 50 community-based nursing services in Vorarlberg were invited to participate in an online survey designed to estimate outpatient palliative care. The survey collected quantitative and descriptive data and 38 nursing services returned the questionnaire (76 %).

resultsAccording to community-based nurses, the proportion of patients in need of palliative care was 5.7 %. This assessment of needs correlates well with the proportion of personnel qualified in palliative care (p = 0.02). Nursing personnel estimated a high prevalence of symptom burden (76 %). Communication between outpatient nursing personnel and general practitioners relied primarily on telephone calls (79-90 %), less on joint rounds (13-21 %) and case reviews (26-45 %). According to 63 % of the nursing personnel the rate of hospitalization could be reduced with better interprofessional cooperation. DISCUSSION: Symptom burden in the outpatient setting was similar to that of patients being cared for in hospitals. Healthcare personnel in general palliative care should be adequately qualified. The quality of communication via telephone calls should be critically examined in further studies.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNursesPalliative CareAustriaCommunity Health NursingHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunicationCooperationNursingOutpatientPalliative care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.