Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402731›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2019

[Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock].

M W Ferrari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M W FerrariKlinik Innere Medizin I, HELIOS Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Ludwig-Erhard-Straße 100, 65199, Wiesbaden, Deutschland. markus.ferrari@helios-gesundheit.de.
Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute revascularization is of utmost importance in acute heart failure and infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Besides this therapy of the underlying disease, methods for rapid restoration of arterial blood pressure and sufficient organ perfusion are at the forefront. If conventional means such as volume management, inotropic support, or infusion of vasopressors fail in this situation, mechanical circulatory support may be indicated in selected cases. Noninvasive systems for automatic thorax compression are used for extended cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Intra-aortic balloon counter pulsation (IABP) and axial turbine pumps provide circulatory support and left ventricular unloading. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) devices consisting of a membrane oxygenator in combination with a centrifugal pump also support the gas exchange in cases of acute pulmonary failure. Using mechanical circulatory support allows lifesaving further diagnostic and therapeutic measures in selected cases, despite limited evidence. They help to restore sufficient arterial blood pressure and therefore organ perfusion in acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart-Assist DevicesHumansIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingOxygenators, MembraneShock, CardiogenicAssisted circulationAxial turbine pumpCardiogenic shockExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID30402731
OpenAlexW2900208571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.