Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402688›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2019

[Definitions and explanations on the topic of fracture reduction].

R Babst, F J P Beeres, B-C Link

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Reduction techniques for acetabular fractures].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  2. Influence of fracture morphology and working length on shear motion and construct stiffness in osteosynthesis constructs.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Minimally invasive double-plating osteosynthesis of the distal femur.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R BabstFachbereich Unfallchirurgie, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6003, Luzern, Schweiz. reto.babst@luks.ch.
F J P BeeresKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Schweiz.
B-C LinkKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of reduction is a key step for successful fracture treatment. The goal of fracture reduction is the realignment of the displaced fractured fragments caused by muscle tension or impaction back into the original anatomic relationship. The reduction process includes not only the application of force at or remote from the fracture site to reverse the deforming forces but also the preoperative planning where to apply these forces and by what means. Furthermore, consideration should be preoperatively given on how to position the patient and the C‑arm and how to temporarily maintain reduction for intraoperative x‑ray control of the axis, rotation and lengths before definitive fixation.

Indexed as

Fracture FixationFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHumansRadiographyTreatment OutcomeBone fracturesFracture fixationFracture reductionRadiographySoft tissue injuries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.