Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402669›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2019

Multi-objective Parameter Auto-tuning for Tissue Image Segmentation Workflows.

Luis F R Taveira, Tahsin Kurc, Alba C M A Melo, Jun Kong, Erich Bremer, Joel H Saltz, George Teodoro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luis F R TaveiraDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Tahsin KurcDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Alba C M A MeloDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Jun KongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Erich BremerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Joel H SaltzDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
George TeodoroDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. teodoro@unb.br.ORCID 0000-0001-6289-3914

Funding

TCIA Sustainment and Scalability - Platforms for Quantitative Imaging Informatics in Precision MedicineU24CA215109 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BANERJEE, IMON, PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2017 to 2021
$8.5M
Image Mining for Comparative Analysis of Expression Patterns in Tissue MicroarrayR01LM009239 · NLM · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI FORAN, DAVID J, SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2007 to 2016
$4.5M
Tools to Analyze Morphology and Spatially Mapped Molecular DataU24CA180924 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2014 to 2019
$3.6M
Informatics for Integrative Brain Tumor Whole Slide AnalysisR01LM011119 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FORAN, DAVID J, SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2011 to 2014
$1.8M
Methods and Tools for Integrating Pathomics Data into Cancer RegistriesUG3CA225021 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI DURBIN, ERIC B., FORAN, DAVID J · 2018 to 2019
$815k
Quantitative Analysis of GBM Invasion Mechanisms with New Imaging ProtocolK25CA181503 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KONG, JUN · 2014 to 2018
$592k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA181503NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180924NCI NIH HHS U24 CA215109NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA225021NIH HHS K25CA181503NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009239NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011119U.S. National Library of Medicine R01LM009239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a software platform that integrates methods and tools for multi-objective parameter auto-tuning in tissue image segmentation workflows. The goal of our work is to provide an approach for improving the accuracy of nucleus/cell segmentation pipelines by tuning their input parameters. The shape, size, and texture features of nuclei in tissue are important biomarkers for disease prognosis, and accurate computation of these features depends on accurate delineation of boundaries of nuclei. Input parameters in many nucleus segmentation workflows affect segmentation accuracy and have to be tuned for optimal performance. This is a time-consuming and computationally expensive process; automating this step facilitates more robust image segmentation workflows and enables more efficient application of image analysis in large image datasets. Our software platform adjusts the parameters of a nuclear segmentation algorithm to maximize the quality of image segmentation results while minimizing the execution time. It implements several optimization methods to search the parameter space efficiently. In addition, the methodology is developed to execute on high-performance computing systems to reduce the execution time of the parameter tuning phase. These capabilities are packaged in a Docker container for easy deployment and can be used through a friendly interface extension in 3D Slicer. Our results using three real-world image segmentation workflows demonstrate that the proposed solution is able to (1) search a small fraction (about 100 points) of the parameter space, which contains billions to trillions of points, and improve the quality of segmentation output by × 1.20, × 1.29, and × 1.29, on average; (2) decrease the execution time of a segmentation workflow by up to 11.79× while improving output quality; and (3) effectively use parallel systems to accelerate parameter tuning and segmentation phases.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusAlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsCell TrackingGlioblastomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareUser-Computer InterfaceWorkflowCancerCell morphologyComputer-assisted image analysisDigital pathologyParameter auto-tuning

Identifiers

PMID30402669
PMCPMC6499855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.