ReviewAllergologie select2017
Molecular allergy diagnostic tests: development and relevance in clinical practice.
Review in Allergologie select, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Fully Automated Chemiluminescent Immunoassay for Component-Resolved Diagnosis of Pollen Allergy: Validation of Six CHORUS CLIA Assays.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Wheat Allergy in the Era of Precision Medicine: From Novel Molecular Markers to New Therapeutic Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From gluten to therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of celiac disease and emerging alternatives to the gluten-free diet.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Respiratory Allergy: Monocentric Reevaluation of the GAClinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- The Allergy Crossroads of Subtropical Regions: Mites, Crustaceans, and the Rise of Edible Insects.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Allergen extract outperforms molecular components in basophil activation test in a pediatric cohort.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Biomarkers for the Molecular Diagnosis of IgE-Mediated Hymenoptera Venom Allergy in Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Protein Biochips with Three-Dimensional Hydrogel or Polymer Brush Elements for the Detection of Human Serum Immunoglobulin E Specific to Inhalation Allergens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Relationship between IgE Levels Specific for Ragweed Pollen Extract, Amb a 1 and Cross-Reactive Allergen Molecules.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Management of Adult Patients with Gastrointestinal Symptoms from Food Hypersensitivity-Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular allergy is based on identification, characterization and subsequent use of single allergens, being components of complex allergen sources like pollen, mites, furred animals, foods or insect venoms. Only few protein families contain relevant allergens of similar sequence and structure, carrying common IgE epitopes as the basis of cross reactivity. Used as purified or recombinant (glyco)proteins single allergens can potentially improve in-vitro diagnostics, particularly allergen-specific IgE assays through a) increased sensitivity, b) use of risk and marker allergens, c) component-resolved diagnostics (CRD). CRD can differentiate primary, species-specific from secondary, cross-reactive sensitizations to single allergens. Allergen components facilitate an increased analytical sensitivity, particularly if they are underrepresented or missing in conventional allergen extracts. They are mainly used in single assays (singleplex) for the detection of IgE, but also in a microarray format (multiplex) with 112 components from 50 allergen sources with slightly decreased analytical sensitivity. Concepts of molecular allergy can only be separately defined and utilized for each allergen source (pollen, mites, foods or insect venoms). As soon as essential singe allergens are available, their specific role in diagnostics should be defined. This requires well characterized patient cohorts from various countries, since exposure, allergic immune response and clinical relevance can vary substantially between individual subjects and geographical regions. The patient's clinical information is essential for proper interpretation of molecular allergology results. The history and/or challenge test results will finally provide evidence, in how far a sensitization to single allergens might be clinically relevant or not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.