Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402548›Full record

ReviewJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2018

Local anesthesia for mandibular third molar extraction.

Chang Kim, Kyung-Gyun Hwang, Chang-Joo Park

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04166890 phase4completednot on this map

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Homologous Active Principles for Local Dental Anesthesia: Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AntioquiaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled179ConditionsDrug Effect, Tooth ExtractionArmsArticaine / EPINEPHrine Cartridge
NCT06641232 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy and Safety Between Nerve Block and Infiltrative Technique for Mandibular Posterior Implant Placement. A Triple-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BarcelonaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsDental Implants, Local AnesthesiaArmsComparison of anesthetic efficacy and safety between nerve block and infiltrative technique for mandibular posterior implant placement.
NCT06644950 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Administration of Different Doses of 4% Articaine (1:100,000 Epinephrine) Using the Lower Dental Nerve Block Technique for Lower Third Molar Extraction. A Triple-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BarcelonaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled110ConditionsTooth Extraction Status Nos, Anesthesia, LocalArmsEfficacy and safety of administering 1 or two cartridges of anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chang KimDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9539-6516
Kyung-Gyun HwangDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8713-660X
Chang-Joo ParkDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6895-9854
Hanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mandibular third molar extraction is commonly performed in dental clinics. However, the optimal method of anesthesia has not been established for this procedure. The conventional inferior alveolar nerve block is the most widely used method. However, its success rate is not high and it may lead to complications, such as aspiration and nerve injury. Therefore, various anesthesia methods are being investigated. Articaine has been proven to be efficacious in a number of studies and is being used with increasing frequency in clinical practice. In this review article, we will briefly review various local anesthesia techniques, anesthetics, and a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system, which reduces pain by controlling the speed of drug injection, for mandibular third molar extraction.

Indexed as

ExtractionLocal AnesthesiaMandibleThird Molar

Identifiers

PMID30402548
PMCPMC6218392
OpenAlexW2899592516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.