Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30402541›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

Mass spectrometry imaging of the in situ drug release from nanocarriers.

Jinjuan Xue, Huihui Liu, Suming Chen, Caiqiao Xiong, Lingpeng Zhan, Jie Sun, Zongxiu Nie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review of methods for the determination of cellular cholesterol content: principles, advantages, limitations, applications, and perspectives.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Spatial pharmacology using mass spectrometry imaging.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinjuan XueBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Living Biosystems, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4965-5433
Huihui LiuBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Living Biosystems, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Suming ChenBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Living Biosystems, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8017-0282
Caiqiao XiongBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Living Biosystems, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5920-6658
Lingpeng ZhanBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Living Biosystems, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5841-0342
Jie SunBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Living Biosystems, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Zongxiu NieBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Living Biosystems, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8514-6348
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is crucial but of a great challenge to study in vivo and in situ drug release of nanocarriers when developing a nanomaterial-based drug delivery platform. We developed a new label-free laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MS) imaging strategy that enabled visualization and quantification of the in situ drug release in tissues by monitoring intrinsic MS signal intensity ratio of loaded drug over the nanocarriers. The proof of concept was demonstrated by investigating the doxorubicin (DOX)/polyethylene glycol-MoS

Indexed as

Drug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LiberationAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsDisulfidesDoxorubicinFemaleLiver NeoplasmsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMolybdenumNanotubes, CarbonPolyethylene GlycolsTumor Cells, CulturedAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDisulfidesDoxorubicinDrug CarriersMolybdenummolybdenum disulfideNanotubes, CarbonPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID30402541
PMCPMC6209387
OpenAlexW2899243736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.