ArticleCureus2018
Four-dimensional Plan Optimization for the Treatment of Lung Tumors Using Pencil-beam Scanning Proton Radiotherapy.
Article in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of 3D and 4D robustly optimized proton treatment plans for non-small cell lung cancer patients with tumour motion amplitudes larger than 5 mm.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Image guidance and interfractional anatomical variation in paediatric abdominal radiotherapy.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Mitigation of motion effects in pencil-beam scanning - Impact of repainting on 4D robustly optimized proton treatment plans for hepatocellular carcinoma.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2022Article
- Adaptive proton therapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Assessment of a diaphragm override strategy for robustly optimized proton therapy planning for esophageal cancer patients.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Impact of errors in spot size and spot position in robustly optimized pencil beam scanning proton-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) lung plans.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Investigating volumetric repainting to mitigate interplay effect on 4D robustly optimized lung cancer plans in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Investigation of inter-fraction target motion variations in the context of pencil beam scanned proton therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: the road ahead.Translational lung cancer research · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of four-dimensional (4D) robust optimization for proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) treatment of lung tumors. Patients and methods In seven patients with lung cancer, proton beam therapy was planned using 4D robust optimization over 4D computed tomography (CT) data sets. The gross target volume (GTV) was contoured based on individual breathing phases, and a 5-mm expansion was used to generate the clinical target volume (CTV) for each phase. The 4D optimization was conducted directly on the 4D CT data set. The robust optimization settings included a CT Hounsfield unit (HU) uncertainty of 4% and a setup uncertainty of 5 mm to obtain the CTV. Additional target dose objectives such as those for the internal target volume (ITV) as well as the organ-at-risk (OAR) dose requirements were placed on the average CT. For comparison, three-dimensional (3D) robust optimization was also performed on the average CT. An additional verification 4D CT was performed to verify plan robustness against inter-fractional variations. Results Target coverages were generally higher for 4D optimized plans. The difference was most pronounced for ITV V70Gy when evaluating individual breathing phases. The 4D optimized plans were shown to be able to maintain the ITV coverage at full prescription, while 3D optimized plans could not. More importantly, this difference in ITV V70Gy between the 4D and 3D optimized plans was also consistently observed when evaluating the verification 4D CT, indicating that the 4D optimized plans were more robust against inter-fractional variations. Less difference was seen between the 4D and 3D optimized plans in the lungs criteria: V5Gy and V20Gy. Conclusion The proton PBS treatment plans optimized directly on the 4D CT were shown to be more robust when compared to those optimized on a regular 3D CT. Robust 4D optimization can improve the target coverage for the proton PBS lung treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.