ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Comparison of the predictive value of four-dimensional speckle tracking imaging risk classification and the TIMI system after STEMI reperfusion therapy.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The predictive value of four-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (4D-STI) risk classification and TIMI risk scores for the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after reperfusion therapy were investigated. One hundred and twenty patients with STEMI after reperfusion therapy were involved. At 12 h after reperfusion therapy, 2nd and 3rd day, the three-dimensional longitudinal strain (LS), circumferential strain (CS) and radial strain (RS), area strain (AS), as well as other 4D-STI detection indicators, were collected. The patients were followed up for one year, and were divided into good prognosis group and poor prognosis group. LS, CS, RS and AS indicators were analyzed between these two groups. The ROC curve was drawn to establish the 4D-STI risk classification and its predictive value for poor prognosis and mortality were compared with TIMI risk scores. AS, LS and RS at 12 h after reperfusion treatment, and AS and RS at 2nd and 3rd day had a certain degree of prediction accuracy in STEMI patients in the poor prognosis group. In the 4D-STI and TIMI risk scores, the risk of death and adverse prognosis significantly increased as the risk scores increased (P<0.01). The 4D-STI risk score for predicting poor prognosis and mortality was greater than the TIMI risk score. 4D-STI risk scores are superior to TIMI risk scores in predicting poor prognosis and mortality in patients with STEMI after reperfusion therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.