ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2018
Multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Experience.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Trial
- China Liver Cancer Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2024 Edition).Liver cancer · 2025Article
- Hybrid FDG-PET/MRI for Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Patients with Suspected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Feasibility Pilot Study.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Review
- Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition).Liver cancer · 2023Article
- Dynamic 2-deoxy-D-glucose-enhanced multispectral optoacoustic tomography for assessing metabolism and vascular hemodynamics of breast cancer.Photoacoustics · 2023Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging for characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma metabolism.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Article
- The Role of Non-Gaussian Models of Diffusion Weighted MRI in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2019 Edition).Liver cancer · 2020Article
- Hybrid imaging of the abdomen and pelvis.Der Radiologe · 2020Review
- [Hybrid imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. German version].Der Radiologe · 2020Review
- A Nude Mouse Model of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma HCCLM3 Cell Xenografts and the Use of Imaging to Evaluate Tumor Progression.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
- Heterogeneous Enhancement Pattern in DCE-MRI Reveals the Morphology of Normal Lymph Nodes: An Experimental Study.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To compare multiparametric (mp)FDG-PET/MRI metrics between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver parenchyma and to assess the correlation between mpMRI and FDG-PET standard uptake values (SUVs) in liver parenchyma and HCC. Methods: This prospective, institutional review board-approved study enrolled 15 patients (M/F 12/3; mean age 61 y) with HCC. mpMRI including blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) MRI, intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced-(DCE-) MRI was performed simultaneously with Results: 21 HCC lesions (mean size 4.0 ± 2.4 cm; range 2-13 cm) were analyzed. HCCs exhibited significantly higher arterial fraction (from DCE-MRI) and lower Conclusions: Despite the observed reasonable diagnostic performance of FDG-PET SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.