Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30401995›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy

Is There a Reason for the Proton Pump Inhibitor? An Assessment of Prescribing for Residential Care Patients in British Columbia.

Adriel Chan, Libby Liang, Anthony C H Tung, Angus Kinkade, Aaron M Tejani

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy
    Article
  7. Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adriel Chan, BSc(Pharm), is with the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Libby Liang, BSc(Pharm), is with the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Anthony C H Tung, BSc(Pharm), ACPR, MBA, is with Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Surrey, British Columbia.
Angus Kinkade, BSc(Pharm), ACPR, PharmD, MSc, is with Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Surrey, British Columbia.
Aaron M Tejani, BSc(Pharm), PharmD, is with Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Surrey British Columbia, and the Therapeutics Initiative (The University of British Columbia), Vancouver, British Columbia.
University of British Columbia · CAWest Pharmaceutical Services (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may cause significant harm to patients in the residential care setting, as these patients are often frail with multiple morbidities. The extent of non-evidence-based use of PPIs in residential care sites of the Fraser Health Authority in British Columbia is unknown.

objectiveTo determine the proportion of non-evidence-based use of PPI therapy for residential care patients of the Fraser Health Authority.

methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 6 Fraser Health residential care facilities in British Columbia between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016. Two definitions of "evidence-based indications" were used. The first definition encompassed

resultsA total of 331 residential care patients and 407 PPI orders were assessed. The proportion of PPI orders without a documented broad evidence-based indication was 16.2% (66/407). The proportion of PPI orders without a documented common evidence-based indication was 43.7% (178/407). The most frequently documented reason for a PPI order was GERD (214/407 or 52.6%). PPI orders for patients with GERD and gastrointestinal bleeding had the longest duration of therapy during residential care admission, averaging 205.1 and 218.1 days, respectively.

conclusionAbout 1 in 6 PPI orders for Fraser Health residential care patients did not have a documented broad evidence-based indication, and about 2 in 5 PPI orders did not have a documented common evidence-based indication. These results indicate a need to assess the appropriateness of therapy for every patient with an active PPI order in residential care facilities.

Indexed as

evidence-based careproton pump inhibitorresidential care

Identifiers

PMID30401995
PMCPMC6209499
OpenAlexW2899757133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.