Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30401818›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

β-Glucuronidases of opportunistic bacteria are the major contributors to xenobiotic-induced toxicity in the gut.

Punsaldulam Dashnyam, Ramesh Mudududdla, Tung-Ju Hsieh, Ting-Chien Lin, Hsien-Ya Lin, Peng-Yuan Chen, Chia-Yi Hsu, Chun-Hung Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Effect of the Duration of Feeding a Diet Containing Cuban Cricket (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Integrating the gut microbiome and pharmacology.Science translational medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Punsaldulam DashnyamMolecular and Biological Agricultural Sciences, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica and National Chung-Hsing University, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Ramesh MudududdlaInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Tung-Ju HsiehInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Ting-Chien LinInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Hsien-Ya LinInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Peng-Yuan ChenInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6444-4933
Chia-Yi HsuInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Chun-Hung LinMolecular and Biological Agricultural Sciences, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica and National Chung-Hsing University, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. chunhung@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut bacterial β-D-glucuronidases (GUSs) catalyze the removal of glucuronic acid from liver-produced β-D-glucuronides. These reactions can have deleterious consequences when they reverse xenobiotic metabolism. The human gut contains hundreds of GUSs of variable sequences and structures. To understand how any particular bacterial GUS(s) contributes to global GUS activity and affects human health, the individual substrate preference(s) must be known. Herein, we report that representative GUSs vary in their ability to produce various xenobiotics from their respective glucuronides. To attempt to explain the distinct substrate preference, we solved the structure of a bacterial GUS complexed with coumarin-3-β-D-glucuronide. Comparisons of this structure with other GUS structures identified differences in loop 3 (or the α2-helix loop) and loop 5 at the aglycone-binding site, where differences in their conformations, hydrophobicities and flexibilities appear to underlie the distinct substrate preference(s) of the GUSs. Additional sequence, structural and functional analysis indicated that several groups of functionally related gut bacterial GUSs exist. Our results pinpoint opportunistic gut bacterial GUSs as those that cause xenobiotic-induced toxicity. We propose a structure-activity relationship that should allow both the prediction of the functional roles of GUSs and the design of selective inhibitors.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBacteriaGlucuronidaseIntestinesProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalXenobioticsGlucuronidaseXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID30401818
PMCPMC6219552
OpenAlexW2899104549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.