ArticlemBio2018
Article in mBio, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Genetic diversity of collaborative cross mice enables the establishment of a novelInfection and immunity · 2026Article
- Bacterial co-infection as a catalyst in HPV-associated cervical carcinogenesis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms of bacteria-mediated cancer immunotherapy: from intratumoral microbiota to engineered therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Comparative transcriptomic profiling of human conjunctival epithelial cells and macrophages in response toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Intratumoral microbiota: bidirectional modulation of tumor radiosensitivity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The role of co-infections and hormonal contraceptives in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prevalence among women referred to a tertiary hospital in Western Kenya.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- Exploiting bacteria for cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Deciphering the Puzzle: Literature Insights onMicroorganisms · 2024Review
- Mycoplasma DnaK expression increases cancer development in vivo upon DNA damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Review
- Transcriptional Profiling of Homologous Recombination Pathway Genes inMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Review
- DNA damage repair promotion in colonic epithelial cells by andrographolide downregulated cGAS‒STING pathway activation and contributed to the relief of CPT-11-induced intestinal mucositis.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2022Article
- Bacteria-Cancer Interface: Awaiting the Perfect Storm.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Review
- Review
- Chlamydia trachomatis and human herpesvirus 6 infections in ovarian cancer-Casual or causal?PLoS pathogens · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical and ovarian cancers exhibit characteristic mutational signatures that are reminiscent of mutational processes, including defective homologous recombination (HR) repair. How these mutational processes are initiated during carcinogenesis is largely unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.