SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2018
Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
136 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Occupational Health Applied Infodemiological Studies of Nutritional Diseases and Disorders: Scoping Review with Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2023Pooled it
- The Characteristics, Uses, and Biases of Studies Related to Malignancies Using Google Trends: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Decision-Making based on Big Data Analytics for People Management in Healthcare Organizations.Journal of medical systems · 2019Pooled it
- Article
- Evaluating Global Online Search Trends for Urinary Incontinence Treatment Modalities: Insights from Google Trends.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Infodemiology of West Nile Virus in Greece, 2024-2025, with Descriptive One Health Preparedness Evidence from Crete.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Google search trends for COVID-19 vaccination administration efforts within an urban department of public health.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Novel Internet Advertising Approach to Raise Public Awareness About Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Are AI chatbots ready for chikungunya public education? Evidence on validity, reliability, and readability.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of interest trends among the general population and scientific community in migraine surgery.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- COJMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Effects of the pandemic and economic crisis on public search trends related to oral and maxillofacial surgery in Türkiye: a Google Trends time-series analysis (2020-2025).BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Multidimensional Perspective on the Quality of Green Onion: Between the Visible, the Measurable, and the Perceived.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Digital epidemiology and public health surveillance: scientometric mapping of emerging technologies and challenges (2000-2025).Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Accelerating Global Interest in Genicular Artery Embolization: A Google Trends Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Digital Trends in the Italian Beer Market: A Time-Series and Search Engine Optimisation Analysis of Gluten-Free and Low/No-Alcohol Beers.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Digital Insights into Workplace Breastfeeding in Indonesia: A Google Trends Analysis of Barriers and Opportunities.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal evolution of online interest in assisted reproductive technology: a two-decade global analysis through google trends.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Analyzing Public Google Search Interest in Measles Within Canada: Identifying Key Moments for Targeted Risk Communication.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the era of information overload, are big data analytics the answer to access and better manage available knowledge? Over the last decade, the use of Web-based data in public health issues, that is, infodemiology, has been proven useful in assessing various aspects of human behavior. Google Trends is the most popular tool to gather such information, and it has been used in several topics up to this point, with health and medicine being the most focused subject. Web-based behavior is monitored and analyzed in order to examine actual human behavior so as to predict, better assess, and even prevent health-related issues that constantly arise in everyday life.
objectiveThis systematic review aimed at reporting and further presenting and analyzing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches for Google Trends (infodemiology) studies in health-related topics from 2006 to 2016 to provide an overview of the usefulness of said tool and be a point of reference for future research on the subject.
methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for selecting studies, we searched for the term "Google Trends" in the Scopus and PubMed databases from 2006 to 2016, applying specific criteria for types of publications and topics. A total of 109 published papers were extracted, excluding duplicates and those that did not fall inside the topics of health and medicine or the selected article types. We then further categorized the published papers according to their methodological approach, namely, visualization, seasonality, correlations, forecasting, and modeling.
resultsAll the examined papers comprised, by definition, time series analysis, and all but two included data visualization. A total of 23.1% (24/104) studies used Google Trends data for examining seasonality, while 39.4% (41/104) and 32.7% (34/104) of the studies used correlations and modeling, respectively. Only 8.7% (9/104) of the studies used Google Trends data for predictions and forecasting in health-related topics; therefore, it is evident that a gap exists in forecasting using Google Trends data.
conclusionsThe monitoring of online queries can provide insight into human behavior, as this field is significantly and continuously growing and will be proven more than valuable in the future for assessing behavioral changes and providing ground for research using data that could not have been accessed otherwise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.