ReviewBMC medical ethics2018
Impact of moral case deliberation in healthcare settings: a literature review.
Review in BMC medical ethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Initial programme theory developing for interprofessional case discussions (InCaD) in acute hospital care: a realist approach.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: an integrative systematic review.BMC medical ethics · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2021Pooled it
- Development and pilot validation of a European ethical framework for decision-making in dementia care.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- From animal ethics to climate change: Integrating human-animal-studies and one health into medical education.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Carrying the Facilitator Responsibility: Experiences of Healthcare Professionals Under Training to Become Facilitators of Ethics Case Reflection Rounds in Paediatric Oncology.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026Article
- Case-Based Clinical Ethics Support - A Description and Normative Discussion of Methodological Issues from the Swedish Perspective.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026Article
- Understanding ethical encounters in a hospital setting: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Navigating resistive behavior that adversely affects the intake of food and fluids in people living with dementia: A multiple case study.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perceptions of ethical issues in palliative sedation: A moral case deliberation study in eight European countries.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Positioning Ethics When Direct Patient Care is Prioritized: Experiences from Implementing Ethics Case Reflection Rounds in Childhood Cancer Care.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2025Article
- Fostering moral reflectivity in community pharmacists through moral case deliberation using the dilemma method.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Digital ethical reflection in home nursing care: Nurse leaders' and nurses' experiences.Nursing ethics · 2025Article
- A User-Driven Framework for Dose Selection in Pregnancy: Proof of Concept for Sertraline.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Navigating the Tensions of Supervision: Medical Educators' Strategies for Supporting Students During End-of-Life Care.Perspectives on medical education · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Study of Norwegian Care Institutions Health Care Workers' Experiences of Ad Hoc Ethical Reflection During the Workday.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Preventing burnout from moral distress among prehospital emergency personnel through action research and targeted clinical ethics support.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- What is a High-Quality Moral Case Deliberation?-Facilitators' Perspectives in the Euro-MCD Project.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024Article
- Understanding mealtime behavioral problems in nursing home residents living with dementia: a group concept mapping approach.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of CURA: Healthcare professionals' moral resilience and moral competences.Nursing ethics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn important and supposedly impactful form of clinical ethics support is moral case deliberation (MCD). Empirical evidence, however, is limited with regard to its actual impact. With this literature review, we aim to investigate the empirical evidence of MCD, thereby a) informing the practice, and b) providing a focus for further research on and development of MCD in healthcare settings.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL and Web of Science (June 2016). Both the data collection and the qualitative data analysis followed a stepwise approach, including continuous peer review and careful documentation of our decisions. The qualitative analysis was supported by ATLAS.ti.
resultsBased on a qualitative analysis of 25 empirical papers, we identified four clusters of themes: 1) facilitators and barriers in the preparation and context of MCD, i.e., a safe and open atmosphere created by a facilitator, a concrete case, commitment of participants, a focus on the moral dimension, and a supportive organization; 2) changes that are brought about on a personal and inter-professional level, with regard to professional's feelings of relief, relatedness and confidence; understanding of the perspectives of colleagues, one's own perspective and the moral issue at stake; and awareness of the moral dimension of one's work and awareness of the importance of reflection; 3) changes that are brought about in caring for patients and families; and 4) changes that are brought about on an organizational level.
conclusionsThis review shows that MCD brings about changes in practice, mostly for the professional in inter-professional interactions. Most reported changes are considered positive, although challenges, frustrations and absence of change were also reported. Empirical evidence of a concrete impact on the quality of patient care is limited and is mostly based on self-reports. With patient-focused and methodologically sound qualitative research, the practice and the value of MCD in healthcare settings can be better understood, thus making a stronger case for this kind of ethics support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.