Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400875›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2018

Accurate hybrid template-based and MR-based attenuation correction using UTE images for simultaneous PET/MR brain imaging applications.

Jakub Baran, Zhaolin Chen, Francesco Sforazzini, Nicholas Ferris, Sharna Jamadar, Ben Schmitt, David Faul, Nadim Jon Shah, Marian Cholewa, Gary F Egan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. MRI classification using semantic random forest with auto-context model.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Jakub BaranMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. jakubbaran92@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4946-3837
Zhaolin ChenMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Francesco SforazziniMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nicholas FerrisMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sharna JamadarMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Ben SchmittSiemens Healthcare Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia.
David FaulSiemens Healthcare Pty Ltd, New York, USA.
Nadim Jon ShahMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Marian CholewaDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland.
Gary F EganMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Australian Research Council · AUMonash University · AUForschungszentrum Jülich · DEInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLMonash Health · AUSiemens (Australia) · AUSiemens Healthcare (United States) · USUniversity of Rzeszów · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttenuation correction is one of the most crucial correction factors for accurate PET data quantitation in hybrid PET/MR scanners, and computing accurate attenuation coefficient maps from MR brain acquisitions is challenging. Here, we develop a method for accurate bone and air segmentation using MR ultrashort echo time (UTE) images.

methodsMR UTE images from simultaneous MR and PET imaging of five healthy volunteers was used to generate a whole head, bone and air template image for inclusion into an improved MR derived attenuation correction map, and applied to PET image data for quantitative analysis. Bone, air and soft tissue were segmented based on Gaussian Mixture Models with probabilistic tissue maps as a priori information. We present results for two approaches for bone attenuation coefficient assignments: one using a constant attenuation correction value; and another using an estimated continuous attenuation value based on a calibration fit. Quantitative comparisons were performed to evaluate the accuracy of the reconstructed PET images, with respect to a reference image reconstructed with manually segmented attenuation maps.

resultsThe DICE coefficient analysis for the air and bone regions in the images demonstrated improvements compared to the UTE approach, and other state-of-the-art techniques. The most accurate whole brain and regional brain analyses were obtained using constant bone attenuation coefficient values.

conclusionsA novel attenuation correction method for PET data reconstruction is proposed. Analyses show improvements in the quantitative accuracy of the reconstructed PET images compared to other state-of-the-art AC methods for simultaneous PET/MR scanners. Further evaluation is needed with radiopharmaceuticals other than FDG, and in larger cohorts of participants.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBrainFluorodeoxyglucose F18Healthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiopharmaceuticalsYoung AdultFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAttenuation correctionBrainPET/MRUTE

Identifiers

PMID30400875
PMCPMC6220492
OpenAlexW2900436446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.