Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400844›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2018

Healthcare workers' views on the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in neonates: a qualitative study in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Juan Emmanuel Dewez, Harish Chellani, Sushma Nangia, Katrin Metsis, Helen Smith, Matthews Mathai, Nynke van den Broek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05064683 (The Effect of Facilitated Tucking and White Noise on Stress and Sleep of Newborns in Nasal CPAP), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05064683 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Facilitated Tucking and White Noise on Stress and Sleep of Newborns in Nasal CPAP

TypeinterventionalSponsorInonu UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled108ConditionsNewborn, Newborn Sleep, Newborn StressArmswhite noise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feasibility of integration of a novel bCPAP system into the NICU of a Public Referral Hospital in Mysuru, India.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan Emmanuel DewezCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Harish ChellaniDepartment of Paediatrics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, Ring Road, Safdarjung West, Safdarjung Campus, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, Delhi, 110029, India.
Sushma NangiaDepartment of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College & Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital, C-604, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Road, Diz Area, Connaught Place, New Delhi, Delhi, 110001, India.
Katrin MetsisCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Helen SmithCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Matthews MathaiCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. Matthews.Mathai@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7352-9330
Nynke van den BroekCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLady Hardinge Medical College · INSafdarjang Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is a form of non-invasive ventilatory support which is increasingly used in low- and middle-income countries to treat neonates with acute respiratory distress. However, it may be harmful if used incorrectly. We aimed to explore the experiences of doctors and nurses using CPAP in neonatal units in India and their views on enablers and barriers to implementation of CPAP.

methodsParticipants from 15 neonatal units across Andhra Pradesh were identified through purposive sampling. Eighteen in-depth interviews (IDI) with doctors and eight focus group discussions (FGD) with 51 nurses were conducted. Data were analysed thematically using the framework approach.

resultsCommon structural factors that limit the use of CPAP include shortages of staff, consumables and equipment, and problems with regard to the organisation of neonatal units in both district hospitals and medical colleges. This meant that CPAP was often not available for babies who were identified to need CPAP, or that CPAP use was not perceived to be of the highest quality. Providing care under constrained circumstances left staff feeling powerless to provide good quality care for neonates with acute respiratory distress. Despite this, staff were enthusiastic about the use of CPAP and its potential to save lives. CPAP use was mostly perceived as technically easier to provide than ventilation and allowed nurses to provide advanced neonatal care, independently of doctors.

conclusionsDoctors and nurses embraced CPAP use but identified barriers to implementation which will need to be addressed in order not to impact on safety and quality of care. Ensuring a supportive and enabling environment is in place will be crucial if CPAP is to be scaled-up more widely.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelContinuous Positive Airway PressureMedical Staff, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalAcademic Medical CentersEquipment and Supplies, HospitalFemaleFocus GroupsHospitals, DistrictHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchCPAPIndiaNeonatal careNon-invasive ventilationQualitative researchQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID30400844
PMCPMC6220518
OpenAlexW2899634825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.