ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Assessing the impact of exact reads on reducing the error rate of read mapping.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- OrthoGarden: a pipeline for propagating phylogenetic trees for nonmodel organisms from short reads and de novo genome assemblies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Review
- Draft Genome Sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain LMG 1272, an Atypical White Line Reaction Producer.Microbiology resource announcements · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNowadays, according to valuable resources of high-quality genome sequences, reference-based assembly methods with high accuracy and efficiency are strongly required. Many different algorithms have been designed for mapping reads onto a genome sequence which try to enhance the accuracy of reconstructed genomes. In this problem, one of the challenges occurs when some reads are aligned to multiple locations due to repetitive regions in the genomes.
resultsIn this paper, our goal is to decrease the error rate of rebuilt genomes by resolving multi-mapping reads. To achieve this purpose, we reduce the search space for the reads which can be aligned against the genome with mismatches, insertions or deletions to decrease the probability of incorrect read mapping. We propose a pipeline divided to three steps: ExactMapping, InExactMapping, and MergingContigs, where exact and inexact reads are aligned in two separate phases. We test our pipeline on some simulated and real data sets by applying some read mappers. The results show that the two-step mapping of reads onto the contigs generated by a mapper such as Bowtie2, BWA and Yara is effective in improving the contigs in terms of error rate.
conclusionsAssessment results of our pipeline suggest that reducing the error rate of read mapping, not only can improve the genomes reconstructed by reference-based assembly in a reasonable running time, but can also have an impact on improving the genomes generated by de novo assembly. In fact, our pipeline produces genomes comparable to those of a multi-mapping reads resolution tool, namely MMR by decreasing the number of multi-mapping reads. Consequently, we introduce EIM as a post-processing step to genomes reconstructed by mappers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.