Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400778›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2018

Time trends in statin use and incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events in secondary prevention between 1999 and 2013: a registry-based study.

Nele Laleman, Séverine Henrard, Marjan van den Akker, Geert Goderis, Frank Buntinx, Gijs Van Pottelbergh, Bert Vaes

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Systemic Statin Use and Pulp Chamber Calcification: A Pilot Retrospective Case-Control Study Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nele LalemanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Séverine HenrardDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Marjan van den AkkerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert GoderisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Frank BuntinxDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Gijs Van PottelberghDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Bert VaesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. bert.vaes@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-5244-1930
KU Leuven · BEMaastricht University · NLUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current study evaluated time trends of statin use and incidence of recurrent CVD in secondary prevention from 1999 to 2013 and investigated which factors were associated with statin use in secondary prevention.

methodsIntego is a primary care registration network with 111 general practitioners working in 48 practices in Flanders, Belgium. This retrospective registry-based study included patients aged 50 years or older with a history of CVD. The time trends of statin use and incidence of recurrent CVD in secondary prevention were determined by using a joinpoint regression analysis. Multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with statin use in patients in secondary prevention in 2013.

resultsThe overall prevalence of statin use increased and showed two trends: a sharp increase from 1999 to 2005 (annual percentage change (APC) 25.4%) and a weaker increase from 2005 to 2013 (APC 3.7%). The average increase in statin use was the highest in patients aged 80 and older. Patients aged 70-79 years received the most statins. Men used more statins than women did, but both genders showed similar time trends. The incidence of CVD decreased by an average APC of 3.9%. There were no differences between men and women and between different age groups. A significant decrease was only observed in older patients without statins prescribed. In 2013, 61% of the patients in secondary prevention did not receive a statin. The absence of other secondary preventive medication was strongly associated with less statin use. Gender, age and comorbidity were associated with statin use to a lesser degree.

conclusionsThe prevalence of statin use in secondary prevention increased strongly from 1999 to 2013. Less than 50% of patients with a history of CVD received a statin in 2013. Especially patients who did not receive other secondary preventive medication were more likely to not receive a statin. Despite the strong increase in statin use, there was only a small decrease in the incidence of recurrent CVD, and this occurred mainly in older patients without statins prescribed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBelgiumBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDyslipidemiasFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIncidenceLipidsMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'BiomarkersHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipidsCardiovascular diseasesSecondary preventionStatinsTrends

Identifiers

PMID30400778
PMCPMC6220501
OpenAlexW2899952427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.