Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400776›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2018

Exploring the impact of public health teams on alcohol premises licensing in England and Scotland (ExILEnS): procotol for a mixed methods natural experiment evaluation.

Niamh Fitzgerald, Matt Egan, Frank de Vocht, Colin Angus, James Nicholls, Niamh Shortt, Tim Nichols, Nason Maani Hessari, Cheryl McQuire, Richard Purves and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Niamh FitzgeraldInstitute of Social Marketing, UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. niamh.fitzgerald@stir.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3643-8165
Matt EganDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Frank de VochtPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Colin AngusSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
James NichollsAlcohol Research UK, London, UK.
Niamh ShorttSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tim Nicholsformerly Brighton & Hove City Council, Brighton, UK.
Nason Maani HessariDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Cheryl McQuirePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Richard PurvesInstitute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Nathan CritchlowInstitute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Andrea MohanInstitute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Laura MahonAlcohol Focus Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Colin SumpterInstitute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Linda BauldInstitute of Social Marketing, UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 15/129/11Department of Health PHR/15/129/11Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent regulatory changes in the system by which premises are licensed to sell alcohol, have given health representatives a formal role in the process in England and Scotland. The degree to which local public health teams engage with this process varies by locality in both nations, which have different licensing regimes. This study aims to critically assess the impact on alcohol-related harms - and mechanisms - of public health stakeholders' engagement in alcohol premises licensing from 2012 to 2018, comparing local areas with differing types and intensities of engagement, and examining practice in Scotland and England.

methodsThe study will recruit 20 local authority areas where public health stakeholders have actively engaged with the alcohol premises licensing system (the 'intervention') and match them to a group of 20 lower activity areas using genetic matching. Four work packages are included: (1) Structured interviews and documentary analysis will examine the type and level of intervention activity from 2012 to 2018, creating a novel composite measure of the intensity of such activity and will assess the local licensing system and potential confounding activities over the same period. In-depth interviews with public health, licensing, police and others will explore perceived mechanisms of change, acceptability, and impact. (2) Using longitudinal growth models and time series analyses, the study will evaluate the impact of high and low levels of activity on alcohol-related harms using routine data from baseline 2009 to 2018. (3) Intervention costs, estimated National Health Service cost savings and health gains will be evaluated using the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model to estimate impact on alcohol consumption and health inequalities. (4) The study will engage public health teams to create a new theory of change for public health involvement in the licensing process using our data. We will share findings with local, national and international stakeholders. DISCUSSION: This interdisciplinary study examines, for the first time, whether and how public health stakeholders' involvement in alcohol licensing impacts on alcohol harms. Using mixed methods and drawing on complex systems thinking, it will make an important contribution to an expanding literature evaluating interventions not suited to traditional epidemiological research.

Indexed as

Public PolicyAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesEnglandHealth PromotionHumansLicensurePublic HealthReproducibility of ResultsScotlandSurveys and QuestionnairesAlcoholAvailabilityComposite measureLocal alcohol policyNatural experimentOutlet densityPremises licensingPublic health

Identifiers

PMID30400776
PMCPMC6219046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.