Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400770›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2018

Accuracy of the painDETECT screening questionnaire for detection of neuropathic components in hospital-based patients with orofacial pain: a prospective cohort study.

Daniyal J Jafree, Joanna M Zakrzewska, Saumya Bhatia, Carolina Venda Nova

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07453511 (Validating a Questionnaire for the Identification of Possible Trigeminal Neuralgia in Dental Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07453511 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Validating a Questionnaire for the Identification of Possible Trigeminal Neuralgia in Dental Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2026 to 2027Enrolled250ConditionsTrigeminal Neuralgia (TN), Orofacial Pain, Dental Pain, QuestionnaireArmsCompletion of the IDTN Questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniyal J JafreeFaculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK. daniyal.jafree.13@ucl.ac.uk.
Joanna M ZakrzewskaEastman Dental Institute, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Saumya BhatiaEastman Dental Institute, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Carolina Venda NovaEastman Dental Institute, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetter tools are required for the earlier identification and management of orofacial pain with different aetiologies. The painDETECT questionnaire is a patient-completed screening tool with utility for identification of neuropathic pain in a range of contexts. 254 patients, referred from primary care for management of orofacial pain and attending a secondary care centre, were prospectively recruited, and completed the painDETECT prior to consultation. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the painDETECT to detect neuropathic components of orofacial pain, when compared to a reference standard of clinical diagnosis by experienced physicians, in a cohort of hospital-based patients.

resultsFor the 251 patients included in the analysis, the painDETECT had a modest ability to detect neuropathic components of orofacial pain (AUROC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.70; p = 0.001). Patients with orofacial pain diagnoses associated with neuropathic components had higher painDETECT scores than those with non-neuropathic components. However, the painDETECT was weaker at distinguishing patients with mixed pain types, and multiple diagnoses were associated with poor accuracy of the painDETECT.

conclusionIn secondary care settings, the painDETECT performed modestly at identifying neuropathic components, and underestimates the complexity of orofacial pain in its mixed presentations and with multiple diagnoses. Prior to clinical applications or research use, the painDETECT and other generic screening tools must be adapted and revalidated for orofacial pain patients, and separately in primary care, where orofacial pain is considerably less common.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAdultAgedCohort StudiesFacial PainFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgiaPain MeasurementProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesDiagnosisNeuropathic painOrofacial painQuestionnaireScreening toolTemporomandibular disorderTrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

PMID30400770
PMCPMC6755558
OpenAlexW2899749373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.