Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400769›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2018

Detection of copy number variations in brown and white layers based on genotyping panels with different densities.

Wioleta Drobik-Czwarno, Anna Wolc, Janet E Fulton, Jack C M Dekkers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-Wide Analysis of Copy Number Variation in Vietnamese Local Chickens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Copy Number Variation (CNV): A New Genomic Insight in Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  4. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wioleta Drobik-CzwarnoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 806 Stange Road, 239E Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50010, USA. wdrobik@iastate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2491-5577
Anna WolcDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 806 Stange Road, 239E Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
Janet E FultonHy-Line International, 2583 240th Street, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA.
Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 806 Stange Road, 239E Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
Iowa State University · USHy-Line (United States) · USWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCopy number variations (CNV) are an important source of genetic variation that has gained increasing attention over the last couple of years. In this study, we performed CNV detection and functional analysis for 18,719 individuals from four pure lines and one commercial cross of layer chickens. Samples were genotyped on four single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping platforms, i.e. the Illumina 42K, Affymetrix 600K, and two different customized Affymetrix 50K chips. CNV recovered from the Affymetrix chips were identified by using the Axiom

resultsThe mean number of CNV per individual varied from 0.50 to 4.87 according to line or cross and size of the SNP genotyping set. The length of the detected CNV across all datasets ranged from 1.2 kb to 3.2 Mb. The number of duplications exceeded the number of deletions for most lines. Between the lines, there were considerable differences in the number of detected CNV and their distribution. Most of the detected CNV had a low frequency, but 19 CNV were identified with a frequency higher than 5% in birds that were genotyped on the 600K panel, with the most common CNV being detected in 734 birds from three lines.

conclusionsCommonly used SNP genotyping platforms can be used to detect segregating CNV in chicken layer lines. The sample sizes for this study enabled a detailed characterization of the CNV landscape within commercially relevant lines. The size of the SNP panel used affected detection efficiency, with more CNV detected per individual on the higher density 600K panel. In spite of the high level of inter-individual diversity and a large number of CNV observed within individuals, we were able to detect 19 frequent CNV, of which, 57.9% overlapped with annotated genes and 89% overlapped with known quantitative trait loci.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsChickensGene OntologyGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisQuantitative Trait LociSoftware

Identifiers

PMID30400769
PMCPMC6219011
OpenAlexW2900045203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.