Multidisciplinary Role of Microfluidics for Biomedical and Diagnostic Applications: Biomedical Microfluidic Devices.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Optical bio-sensing of DNA methylation analysis: an overview of recent progress and future prospects.RSC advances · 2022
   Review
2. Complementary performances of convolutional and capsule neural networks on classifying microfluidic images of dividing yeast cells.PloS one · 2021
   Article
3. Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications: Biomedical Microfluidic Devices 2019.Micromachines · 2020
   Article
4. Wireless Electrochemical Detection on a Microfluidic Compact Disc (CD) and Evaluation of Redox-Amplification during Flow.Micromachines · 2019
   Article
5. Continuous Recirculation of Microdroplets in a Closed Loop Tailored for Screening of Bacteria Cultures.Micromachines · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract