Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30400374›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System-Are We There Yet?

Johanna Amalia Robinson, David Kocman, Milena Horvat, Alena Bartonova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Harmonization and Visualization of Data from a Transnational Multi-Sensor Personal Exposure Campaign.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna Amalia RobinsonDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. johanna.robinson@ijs.si.
David KocmanDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. david.kocman@ijs.si.
Milena HorvatDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. milena.horvat@ijs.si.
Alena BartonovaNILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, 2007 Kjeller, Norway. alena.bartonova@nilu.no.

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS P1-0143Seventh Framework Programme 308524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-cost sensors are a current trend in citizen science projects that focus on air quality. Until now, devices incorporating such sensors have been tested primarily for their technical capabilities and limitations, whereas their usability and acceptability amongst the public rarely goes beyond proof of concept, leaving user experience (UX) unstudied. The authors argue that UX should be taken into account to make sure that products and services are fit for purpose. Nineteen volunteers tested and evaluated a prototype device and provided feedback through semi-structured interviews and during focus group sessions. Their UX was then coded using mixed coding methods regarding device functionality and recommendations for future product development. The results indicate that UX can identify potentially problematic design aspects while giving deeper insights into user needs. For example, UX recognized that one of the most important aspects of user involvement and motivation was successful data harvesting, which frequently failed. This study recommends that future developers of low-cost portable air quality sensor systems prioritize reliable data transmission to minimize data loss. This will ensure an efficient and positive UX that supports user engagement in citizen science based research where collecting sensor-based data is the primary objective.

Indexed as

air qualitycitizen sciencelow-cost portable sensor systemuser experienceuser needs

Identifiers

PMID30400374
PMCPMC6263673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.